Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., LTD et al v. Handa Pharmaceuticals, LLC

Filing 287

ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero denying (281) Motion for Leave to File in case 3:11-cv-00840-JCS; denying (246) Motion for Leave to File in case 3:11-cv-01609-JCS; denying (249) Motion for Leave to File in case 3:11-cv-01610-JCS (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2013)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD, et

8

al.,

Related Cases: C-11-01609, C-11-01610
Plaintiff,

9

v.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No.: 11-00840 JCS

HANDA PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, et al.,
Defendant.

12
13
14
15

ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE A MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF TAKEDA’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ITS
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS TO
ASSERT INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE
DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS; OR IN
THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR JUDGMENT
OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF U.S.
PATENT NO. 7,790,755 UNDER FED. R.
CIV. P. 54(B)

16

Docket No. 281

17
18
19
20
21

TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.,
et al.,
Plaintiff,

22
23
24
25

v.
ANCHEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
AND TWI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Defendants.

26
27

TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.,

28

ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,
P

1
2
3
4

v.
IMP
PAX LABOR
RATORIES, INC.,
,
Defendant.
D

5
6
7

The Cou has revie
urt
ewed Takeda Motion F Leave To File A Mot
a’s
For
o
tion For
Rec
consideration Of Takeda Motion For Leave To Amend Its Infringemen Contentio To
n
a’s
F
o
nt
ons

9

Ass Infringement Under The Doctrin Of Equiva
sert
ne
alents; Or In The Altern
n
native, For Ju
udgment Of

10

Non
ninfringeme Of U.S. Patent No. 7,
ent
P
,790,755 Un
nder Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(B (“the Mot
B)
tion”). As

11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

8

to Takeda’s req
T
quest for leav to file a motion for re
ve
m
econsideratio of the Cou
on
urt’s prior order

12

den
nying Takeda motion to amend its infringemen contention the Motio is DENIE With
a’s
o
nt
ns,
on
ED.

13

resp to Take
pect
eda’s request for judgment of noninfr
t
fringement u
under Rule 54 of the F
4(b)
Federal

14

Rul of Civil Procedure, each of the Defendants in the related cases is req
les
P
e
D
n
d
quested to fil a
le

15

resp
ponse within one week of the date of this order.
n
o

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERE
O
ED.
Dat
ted: April 22, 2013

18

___
__________
___________
___
Jos
seph C. Sper
ro
Un
nited States M
Magistrate Ju
udge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2