Seebrook v. Carter's Retail, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR
H. TIM HOFFMAN (049141)
([e-mail])
ARTHUR W. LAZEAR (083603)
([e-mail])
CHAD A. SAUNDERS (257810)
([e-mail])
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1550
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

CALL & JENSEN
A Professional Corporation
Matthew R. Orr, Bar No. 211097
[e-mail]
Scott R. Hatch, Bar No. 241563
[e-mail]
610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 700
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Newman Strawbridge, SBN 171360
LAW OFFICE OF NEWMAN STRAWBRIDGE
719 Orchard Street
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Telephone: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendant
Carter’s Retail, Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
GALINA SEEBROOK

11
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17

GALINA SEEBROOK, individually and on
behalf of all other similarly situated,

20
21

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff,

18
19

Case No. 3:11-cv-00841-SC

v.

Judge:
Courtroom:

Hon. Samuel Conti
1, 17th Floor

CARTER’S RETAIL, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Defendant.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00841-SC

1

Plaintiff Galina Seebrook and defendant Carter’s Retail, Inc., by and through their

2

respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all of Plaintiff’s individual claims in the above-

3

captioned action are hereby dismissed with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal

4

Rules of Civil Procedure. The claims asserted on behalf of a putative class are dismissed without

5

prejudice. The parties agree to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs associated with this action

6

and its dismissal.

7
8

Because this stipulation is signed by all parties who have appeared and no class has been
certified, no Court order is necessary to effectuate dismissal.

9
10
11

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: March 1, 2012

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR

12
13

/s/ Chad A. Saunders
Chad A. Saunders (257810)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GALINA SEEBROOK

14
15
16

Dated: March 1, 2012

CALL & JENSEN

17
18
19

/s/ Scott R Hatch
Scott R. Hatch (241563)
Attorneys for Defendant
CARTER’S RETAIL, INC.

20
21

UNIT
ED

25

ERED

O ORD

IT IS S

onti

A

H

LI

RT

FO

amuel C

Judge S

ER

26

R NIA

24

NO

23

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

22

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

27
28
2.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00841-SC

1
2
3

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that
all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice.

4
Dated: March 1, 2012

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR

5
6
7
8

/s/ Chad A. Saunders
Chad A. Saunders (257810)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Galina Seebrook

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00841-SC