The Sierra Club et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Filing 59

ORDER - Status Report due by 6/11/2013.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/5/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2013)

Download PDF
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ER N F D IS T IC T O R R NIA FO C Attorneys for Plaintiffs MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612) United States Attorney ALEX TSE (CSBN 152348) Acting Chief, Civil Division ABRAHAM A. SIMMONS (CSBN 146400) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-7264 Facsimile: (415) 436-6748 Email: abraham.simmons@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Federal Defendant IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 21 Case No. C-11-0846-MEJ THE SIERRA CLUB and ENVIRONMENTAL 22 INTEGRITY PROJECT, THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT Plaintiffs, 23 24 Ju H 8 RT 7 s na Jame ria-Ele dge Ma NO 6 Elena Saxonhouse (California Bar. No. 235139) Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 Second St., 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 977-5765 (415) 977-5793 (facsimile) Elena.Saxonhouse@Sierraclub.org LI 5 TED GRAN A 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 3 S 2 David A. Bahr (Oregon Bar No. 90199) Bahr Law Offices, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 (541) 556-6439 davebahr@mindspring.com UNIT ED 1 vs. 25 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 26 Defendant. 27 28 Third Supplemental Joint Case Management Report 11-846 MEJ 1 BAHR LAW OFFICES, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 (541) 556-6439 1 2 3 4 5 6 This is an action brought by Plaintiffs pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, to compel production of documents. The information request upon which this suit is based, sought information submitted to defendant relating to the operations of coal-fired power plants owned by the Luminant Corporation. After the parties completed briefing cross-motions for summary judgment, but before oral argu- 7 ment on same, on May 20, 2012, the Court vacated the scheduled hearing and ordered the parties to 8 meet and confer in her chambers on May 30, 2012. Dkt. No. 50. After fruitful discussion in chambers, 9 the parties agreed to continue with informal settlement discussions in an effort to resolve this matter 10 11 12 13 14 without further litigation. Accordingly, the parties engaged in a number of direct and informal settlement conference calls and have exchanged a settlement proposal. Additionally, as the Parties informed the Court, recent EPA enforcement activities involving Luminant have impacted EIP and Sierra Club’s interest in the documents at issue in this matter. Because the parties required additional time in which to 15 explore possible resolution of this case, when they reported back to the Court on September 20, 2012, 16 they requested that the case be stayed until November 21, 2012 by which time they would inform the 17 Court of the status of their settlement efforts. Dkt. No. 52. The Court so ordered. Dkt. No. 53. 18 19 The parties reported to the court on November 21, 2012, that they desired additional time to explore a possible settlement of this case. Dkt. No. 54. Accordingly, the Court set December 21, 2012 as a 20 21 deadline for the parties to report their progress in this regard. Dkt. No. 55. 22 The parties then reported to the court on December 19, 2012, that they desired an additional 60 23 days to explore a possible settlement of this case. Dkt. No. 56. Accordingly, the Court set February 21, 24 2013 as a deadline for the parties to report their progress in this regard. Dkt. No. 57. The Parties apolo- 25 gize to the Court that they did not submit this report by February 21, 2013. 26 27 28 The Parties have continued their dialogue, believe they are making substantive progress toward reaching a settlement, and are closer to a general consensus on how to settle the case. However, because Third Supplemental Joint Case Management Report 11-846 MEJ 2 BAHR LAW OFFICES, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 (541) 556-6439 1 of the complexity of the issues involved, the Parties require additional time to negotiate the details of the 2 settlement terms and obtain approval for a final settlement from their respective organizations. They 3 4 5 6 7 8 therefore desire additional time in which to explore a negotiated resolution to this dispute. Accordingly, the Parties request that they be provided an additional 90 days in which to attempt to conclude their settlement negotiations and report back to the Court on the status of same no later than May 28, 2013. Respectfully submitted for the Court’s consideration, this 27th day of February, 2013. 9 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 10 11 12 13 14 15 __s/ David Bahr__________________ David Bahr (Oregon Bar No. 901990) Bahr Law Offices, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 (541) 556-6439 davebahr@mindspring.com _s/ Abraham Simmons _____ ABRAHAM SIMMONS Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Federal Defendant 16 17 18 The parties shall file an updated status report by June 11, 2013. Dated: March 5, 2013 19 20 S RT 25 Ju ER 27 R NIA A H 26 s na Jame ria-Ele dge Ma NO 24 LI 23 DERED O OR IT IS S FO UNIT ED 22 RT U O 21 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 Third Supplemental Joint Case Management Report 11-846 MEJ 3 BAHR LAW OFFICES, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 (541) 556-6439

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?