The Sierra Club et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Filing 76

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 75 Motion for Extension of Time to File (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 David A. Bahr (Oregon Bar No. 90199) Bahr Law Offices, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 (541) 556-6439 davebahr@mindspring.com Elena Saxonhouse (California Bar. No. 235139) Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 Second St., 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 977-5765 (415) 977-5793 (facsimile) Elena.Saxonhouse@Sierraclub.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 Case No. C-11-0846-MEJ THE SIERRA CLUB and ENVIRONMENTAL 14 INTEGRITY PROJECT, 16 PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR ATTORNEY FEE PETITION AND COST BILL; DECLARATION OF COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 17 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 Plaintiffs hereby move this Court for an order extending the bill of costs and attorney fee petition deadlines by 21 days. An order granting the parties’ stipulated dismissal of all claims in this action, ex- 23 cept plaintiffs’ claims for costs and attorneys’ fees, was entered March 3, 2014 (dkt. # 72), establishing 24 the deadlines for both the bill of costs and fee petition as March 20, 2014. See L.R. 54-1(a), L.R. 54-5(a) 25 and F.R.Civ.P. 54(d). Subsequently, on March 12, 2014, the parties filed a Stipulation Extending Time 26 27 28 For Plaintiffs To File Petition For Costs And Attorney Fees. (Dkt. # 73). Later that same day, the Court granted the stipulation and extended until May 19, 2014, the deadlines for both the bill of costs and fee PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR ATTORNEY FEE PETITION AND COST BILL; DECLARATION OF COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 petition. (Dkt. # 74). Plaintiffs now move for an enlargement of time until June 9, 2014, in which to file attorney fee petition and cost bill. This motion is supported by the Declaration of Counsel incorporated into this document. Infra. A district court's decision regarding an extension of time lies well within its discretion. United 7 States ex rel. Hawaiian Rock Prods. Corp. v. A.E. Lopez Enters., 74 F.3d 972, 976 (9th Cir.1996) (estab- 8 lishing that such a decision will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion). 9 10 11 12 13 14 For the following reasons, the Plaintiffs assert good cause exists to grant this request for an enlargement of time. 1. On May 7, 2014, the undersigned counsel’s mother suffered a medical emergency that appears to be a heart attack. She is currently in the Intensive Care Unit of West Valley Hospital in Goodyear, Arizona. The undersigned is planning on going to Arizona to be with his mother 15 soon and will probably stay to help her whenever she is released from the hospital. Because of 16 the rapidly developing nature of these events, the undersigned is not sure how long he will be re- 17 quired to stay in Arizona to assist with his mother’s recovery. In addition to providing care and 18 19 20 21 support for his mother’s recuperation, the undersigned will also substitute for his mother’s role as a caregiver for his niece and nephew (ages four and six, respectively) while his mother regains her facilities. The time Plaintiffs’ counsel spends assisting his mother’s recovery will interfere 22 with his ability to develop and complete Plaintiffs’ petition for attorney fees and costs. 23 2. 24 has already been dismissed pursuant to a negotiated settlement agreement via the stipu- 25 lated dismissed mentioned above. Dkt. # 72. 26 3. This request will not unreasonably delay final disposition of this case. The case No party will be disadvantaged by this enlargement of time. If this motion is 27 28 granted, delay in resolution of the cost and attorney fee issue will not materially prejudice PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR ATTORNEY FEE PETITION AND COST BILL; DECLARATION OF COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 1 the resolution of substantive issues for any of the parties to this case. 2 4. 3 This is Plaintiffs’ second request for an enlargement of time to resolve the issues of costs and attorney fees in this case. 4 5. 6 This request for enlargement is made in good faith and for no improper purpose. 6. 5 On May 8, 2014, undersigned counsel conferred by email and phone message 7 with Defendant’s counsel regarding this motion. On May 8, 2014, Defendant notified the 8 undersigned counsel that it does not oppose this request. 9 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully requests the Court to enlarge Plaintiffs’ time to file their 10 attorney fee petition and cost bill until June 9, 2014. 11 Respectfully submitted for the Court’s consideration, this 9th day of May, 2014. 12 13 __s/ David Bahr__________________ David Bahr (Oregon Bar No. 901990) Bahr Law Offices, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 (541) 556-6439 davebahr@mindspring.com 14 15 16 17 18 _____________________________________________________ 19 20 21 22 23 24 DECLARATION OF COUNSEL 1. My name is David Bahr. I am plaintiffs’ lead counsel in this case. This declaration is based on my personal knowledge and experience. 2. On May 7, 2014, the undersigned counsel’s mother suffered a medical emergency that appears to 25 be a heart attack. She is currently in the Intensive Care Unit of West Valley Hospital in Goodyear, Ari- 26 zona. I am planning on going to Arizona to be with my mother soon and will probably stay to help her 27 whenever she is released from the hospital. Because of the rapidly developing nature of these events, I 28 PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR ATTORNEY FEE PETITION AND COST BILL; DECLARATION OF COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 1 am not sure how long I will be required to stay in Arizona to assist with my mother’s recovery. In addi- 2 tion to providing care and support for my mother’s recuperation, I will also substitute for my mother’s 3 4 5 6 role as a caregiver for my niece and nephew (ages four and six, respectively) while my mother regains her facilities. The time I spend assisting my mother’s recovery will interfere with my ability to develop and complete Plaintiffs’ petition for attorney fees and costs. 7 3. 8 and attorney fees in this case. 9 4. This request for enlargement is made in good faith and for no improper purpose. 5. On May 8, 2014, I conferred by email and phone message with Defendants’ counsel re- 10 11 12 13 garding this motion. On May 8, 2014, Defendants notified me, through its counsel, that it does not oppose this request. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true 14 15 This is Plaintiffs’ second request for an enlargement of time to resolve the issues of costs and correct. Executed this 9th day of May, 2014, in Eugene, Oregon. 16 __s/ David Bahr__________________ David Bahr (Oregon Bar No. 901990) Bahr Law Offices, P.C. 1035 ½ Monroe Street Eugene, OR 97402 17 18 19 20 21 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR ATTORNEY FEE PETITION AND COST BILL; DECLARATION OF COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 1 2 3 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER This Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to extend the deadline for attorney fee petition and cost bill, and after considering the moving papers, arguments of counsel, and all other matters presented to the Court, HEREBY FINDS AND ORDERS THAT: 5 6 Plaintiffs’ attorney fee petition and cost bill shall be due no later than June 9, 2014. 7 8 9th IT IS SO ORDERED, this _____ day of May, 2014. 9 10 11 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES Chief United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR ATTORNEY FEE PETITION AND COST BILL; DECLARATION OF COUNSEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?