Xoom Corporation v. Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC et al
Filing
34
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 30 Ex Parte Application (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Kristin Achterhof (pending admission pro hac vice)
Cathay Y. N. Smith (pending admission pro hac vice)
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
525 W. Monroe Street
Chicago, IL 60601-3693
Telephone: (312) 902-5200
Facsimile: (312) 902-1061
Email: kristin.achterhof@kattenlaw.com
cathay.smith@kattenlaw.com
Dennis B. Kass, State Bar No. 137263
Richard G. Garcia, State Bar No. 198185
MANNING & KASS
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
One California Street, Suite 1100
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 217-6900
Facsimile: (415) 217-6999
Email: dbk@manningllp.com
rgg@manningllp.com
11
12
13
Attorneys for Defendants
MOTOROLA TRADEMARK HOLDINGS, LLC,
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., and
MOTOROLA MOBILITY HOLDINGS, INC.
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
XOOM CORPORATION, a California Corporation, )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MOTOROLA TRADEMARK HOLDINGS, LLC, a )
Delaware limited liability company, MOTOROLA )
MOBILITY, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
)
MOTOROLA MOBILITY HOLDINGS, INC., a
)
Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 10
)
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
__________________________________________ )
Case No.: 11-CV-00848 CRB
UNOPPOSED EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR A
CONTINUANCE OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
DATE AND RELATED
DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2011
TIME: 8:30 A.M.
COURTROOM: 8, 19TH FLOOR
26
27
28
Plaintiff Xoom Corporation (“Xoom Corporation”) filed its Complaint against Defendants
Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC, Motorola Mobility, Inc., and Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.
-1________________________________________________________________________________
UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CM C AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
(collectively “Motorola”) on February 23, 2011. On September 2, 2011, the Court granted the
2
parties’ Consented Motion for an Extension of Case Management Conference and Related
3
Deadlines. The Court set a November 11, 2011 deadline for the Case Management Conference
4
Joint Statement, and scheduled a Case Management Conference for November 18, 2011, at 8:30
5
a.m. The parties had been engaged in settlement discussions.
6
On October 28, 2011, Xoom Corporation served Motorola with its Complaint. Motorola’s
7
Answer is now due on November 18, 2011. Given that the Case Management Conference is
8
scheduled for the same date that Motorola’s Answer is due and that the related Case Management
9
Conference deadlines are scheduled before Motorola’s Answer is even due, good cause exists to
10
extend the Case Management Conference and related deadlines so that they occur after Motorola’s
11
Answer is due. See FRCP 6(b)(1)(A) (“When an act may or must be done within a specified time,
12
the court may, for good cause, extend the time: (A) with or without motion or notice if the court
13
acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires.”)
14
As such, Motorola respectfully requests a continuance of the Case Management Conference
15
to December 16, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., and to extend all the dates calculated from the Case
16
Management Conference date accordingly. Xoom Corporation has advised Motorola that it will not
17
oppose this ex parte application to continue the Case Management Conference and related dates.
18
19
Dated: November 8, 2011
MANNING & KASS
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
20
21
By:
22
23
24
S:\ Richard G. Garcia
Dennis B. Kass
Richard G. Garcia
Attorneys for Defendants
Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC, Motorola
Mobility, Inc., Motorola Mobility Holdings,
Inc.
25
26
27
28
-2________________________________________________________________________________
UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CM C AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
Having reviewed Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC, Motorola Mobility, Inc. and
3
Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.’s unopposed Ex Parte Application for Continuance of Case
4
Management Conference and Related Deadlines and finding good cause for the Application,
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference is continued until
6
December 16, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. and the dates calculated on the Case Management Conference date
7
shall be extended accordingly.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
R NIA
yer
S
ER
FO
s R. Bre
harle
Judge C
H
15
RT
14
HONORABLE ORDE
O CHARLES R. BREYER
IT S S
UNITEDISTATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NO
13
______________________________________
RED
LI
12
Dated: November ___, 2011
14
UNIT
ED
11
RT
U
O
10
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
9
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3________________________________________________________________________________
UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CM C AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?