Xoom Corporation v. Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC et al

Filing 34

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 30 Ex Parte Application (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kristin Achterhof (pending admission pro hac vice) Cathay Y. N. Smith (pending admission pro hac vice) KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP 525 W. Monroe Street Chicago, IL 60601-3693 Telephone: (312) 902-5200 Facsimile: (312) 902-1061 Email: kristin.achterhof@kattenlaw.com cathay.smith@kattenlaw.com Dennis B. Kass, State Bar No. 137263 Richard G. Garcia, State Bar No. 198185 MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP One California Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 217-6900 Facsimile: (415) 217-6999 Email: dbk@manningllp.com rgg@manningllp.com 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants MOTOROLA TRADEMARK HOLDINGS, LLC, MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., and MOTOROLA MOBILITY HOLDINGS, INC. 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 XOOM CORPORATION, a California Corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MOTOROLA TRADEMARK HOLDINGS, LLC, a ) Delaware limited liability company, MOTOROLA ) MOBILITY, INC., a Delaware corporation, and ) MOTOROLA MOBILITY HOLDINGS, INC., a ) Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 10 ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) __________________________________________ ) Case No.: 11-CV-00848 CRB UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND RELATED DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2011 TIME: 8:30 A.M. COURTROOM: 8, 19TH FLOOR 26 27 28 Plaintiff Xoom Corporation (“Xoom Corporation”) filed its Complaint against Defendants Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC, Motorola Mobility, Inc., and Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. -1________________________________________________________________________________ UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CM C AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 (collectively “Motorola”) on February 23, 2011. On September 2, 2011, the Court granted the 2 parties’ Consented Motion for an Extension of Case Management Conference and Related 3 Deadlines. The Court set a November 11, 2011 deadline for the Case Management Conference 4 Joint Statement, and scheduled a Case Management Conference for November 18, 2011, at 8:30 5 a.m. The parties had been engaged in settlement discussions. 6 On October 28, 2011, Xoom Corporation served Motorola with its Complaint. Motorola’s 7 Answer is now due on November 18, 2011. Given that the Case Management Conference is 8 scheduled for the same date that Motorola’s Answer is due and that the related Case Management 9 Conference deadlines are scheduled before Motorola’s Answer is even due, good cause exists to 10 extend the Case Management Conference and related deadlines so that they occur after Motorola’s 11 Answer is due. See FRCP 6(b)(1)(A) (“When an act may or must be done within a specified time, 12 the court may, for good cause, extend the time: (A) with or without motion or notice if the court 13 acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires.”) 14 As such, Motorola respectfully requests a continuance of the Case Management Conference 15 to December 16, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., and to extend all the dates calculated from the Case 16 Management Conference date accordingly. Xoom Corporation has advised Motorola that it will not 17 oppose this ex parte application to continue the Case Management Conference and related dates. 18 19 Dated: November 8, 2011 MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP 20 21 By: 22 23 24 S:\ Richard G. Garcia Dennis B. Kass Richard G. Garcia Attorneys for Defendants Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC, Motorola Mobility, Inc., Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. 25 26 27 28 -2________________________________________________________________________________ UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CM C AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Having reviewed Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC, Motorola Mobility, Inc. and 3 Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc.’s unopposed Ex Parte Application for Continuance of Case 4 Management Conference and Related Deadlines and finding good cause for the Application, 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference is continued until 6 December 16, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. and the dates calculated on the Case Management Conference date 7 shall be extended accordingly. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 R NIA yer S ER FO s R. Bre harle Judge C H 15 RT 14 HONORABLE ORDE O CHARLES R. BREYER IT S S UNITEDISTATES DISTRICT JUDGE NO 13 ______________________________________ RED LI 12 Dated: November ___, 2011 14 UNIT ED 11 RT U O 10 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 9 N F D IS T IC T O R C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3________________________________________________________________________________ UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CM C AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?