Groupion, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. et al
Filing
255
ORDER GRANTING 254 STIPULATION TO VACATE TRIAL DATE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/3/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)
Case3:11-cv-00870-JSW Document254 Filed11/30/12 Page1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB No. 178058)
jwakefield@fenwick.com
TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB No. 236096)
tgregorian@fenwick.com
CLIFFORD C. WEBB (CSB No. 260885)
cwebb@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 875-2300
Facsimile: (415) 281-1350
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
GROUPON, INC.
JACK RUSSO (CSB No. 96068)
jrusso@computerlaw.com
CHRISTOPHER SARGENT (CSB No. 246285)
csargent@computerlaw.com
COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLC
401 Florence Street
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone:
650.327.9800
Facsimile:
650.618.1863
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant GROUPION, LLC and Specially
Appearing for PETER-CHRISTOPH HAIDER
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
SAN FRANCISCO
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
14
GROUPION, LLC, a California limited
liability company,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
Case No.: 3:11-cv-00870-JSW (MEJ)
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE
TRIAL DATE
v.
GROUPON, INC., a Delaware corporation,
THE POINT, INC., a Delaware corporation,
and GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendants.
19
20
GROUPON, INC., a Delaware corporation,
21
Counterclaimant,
22
v.
23
24
GROUPION, LLC, a California limited
liability company, and PETER-CHRISTOPH
HAIDER, an individual
25
Counterclaim Defendants.
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Case No.: 3:11-cv-00870-JSW (MEJ)
Case3:11-cv-00870-JSW Document254 Filed11/30/12 Page2 of 4
1
WHEREAS, on August 20, 2012, this Court ordered that the parties appear at a settlement
2
conference before one of the district’s Magistrate Judges (Dkt. 192), and said settlement conference
3
took place on September 24, 2012 before Magistrate Judge Cousins;
4
5
6
WHEREAS, the parties were subsequently able to reach an agreement in principle settling
all claims in the litigation;
WHEREAS, the parties have worked diligently to finalize settlement documentation and
7
related documents, but do not expect to have that documentation completed before the December 4,
8
2012 pretrial conference; and
9
10
11
WHEREAS, the parties do not wish to expend resources on or burden the Court with further
trial preparation work in light of the impending settlement;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the
SAN FRANCISCO
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that all currently pending case deadlines be vacated,
13
and that counsel for the parties shall either file dismissals of the action or report to Magistrate Judge
14
Cousins for a further settlement conference on or before December 14, 2012.
15
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Dated: November 30, 2012
17
By: /s/Jedediah Wakefield
Jedediah Wakefield
Attorneys for Counterclaimant
Groupon, Inc.
18
19
20
Dated: November 30, 2012
COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP
21
By: /s/Jack Russo
Jack Russo
Attorneys for Counterclaim Defendants
Groupion, LLC and Peter Christoph Haider
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
1
Case No.: 3:11-cv-00870-JSW (MEJ)
Case3:11-cv-00870-JSW Document254 Filed11/30/12 Page4 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, and good cause appearing, all currently pending case
2
3
deadlines are VACATED. Counsel for the parties shall either file dismissals of the action or
4
report to Magistrate Judge Cousins for a further settlement conference on or before December 14,
5
2012.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 3
Dated: November ___, 2012
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
9
10
11
SAN FRANCISCO
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
3
Case No.: 3:11-cv-00870-JSW (MEJ)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?