Groupion, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. et al

Filing 255

ORDER GRANTING 254 STIPULATION TO VACATE TRIAL DATE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/3/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-00870-JSW Document254 Filed11/30/12 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB No. 178058) jwakefield@fenwick.com TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB No. 236096) tgregorian@fenwick.com CLIFFORD C. WEBB (CSB No. 260885) cwebb@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant GROUPON, INC. JACK RUSSO (CSB No. 96068) jrusso@computerlaw.com CHRISTOPHER SARGENT (CSB No. 246285) csargent@computerlaw.com COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLC 401 Florence Street Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: 650.327.9800 Facsimile: 650.618.1863 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant GROUPION, LLC and Specially Appearing for PETER-CHRISTOPH HAIDER 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 GROUPION, LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 Case No.: 3:11-cv-00870-JSW (MEJ) JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO VACATE TRIAL DATE v. GROUPON, INC., a Delaware corporation, THE POINT, INC., a Delaware corporation, and GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. 19 20 GROUPON, INC., a Delaware corporation, 21 Counterclaimant, 22 v. 23 24 GROUPION, LLC, a California limited liability company, and PETER-CHRISTOPH HAIDER, an individual 25 Counterclaim Defendants. 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 3:11-cv-00870-JSW (MEJ) Case3:11-cv-00870-JSW Document254 Filed11/30/12 Page2 of 4 1 WHEREAS, on August 20, 2012, this Court ordered that the parties appear at a settlement 2 conference before one of the district’s Magistrate Judges (Dkt. 192), and said settlement conference 3 took place on September 24, 2012 before Magistrate Judge Cousins; 4 5 6 WHEREAS, the parties were subsequently able to reach an agreement in principle settling all claims in the litigation; WHEREAS, the parties have worked diligently to finalize settlement documentation and 7 related documents, but do not expect to have that documentation completed before the December 4, 8 2012 pretrial conference; and 9 10 11 WHEREAS, the parties do not wish to expend resources on or burden the Court with further trial preparation work in light of the impending settlement; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that all currently pending case deadlines be vacated, 13 and that counsel for the parties shall either file dismissals of the action or report to Magistrate Judge 14 Cousins for a further settlement conference on or before December 14, 2012. 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. FENWICK & WEST LLP Dated: November 30, 2012 17 By: /s/Jedediah Wakefield Jedediah Wakefield Attorneys for Counterclaimant Groupon, Inc. 18 19 20 Dated: November 30, 2012 COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP 21 By: /s/Jack Russo Jack Russo Attorneys for Counterclaim Defendants Groupion, LLC and Peter Christoph Haider 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Case No.: 3:11-cv-00870-JSW (MEJ) Case3:11-cv-00870-JSW Document254 Filed11/30/12 Page4 of 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, and good cause appearing, all currently pending case 2 3 deadlines are VACATED. Counsel for the parties shall either file dismissals of the action or 4 report to Magistrate Judge Cousins for a further settlement conference on or before December 14, 5 2012. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. December 3 Dated: November ___, 2012 The Honorable Jeffrey S. White 9 10 11 SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 Case No.: 3:11-cv-00870-JSW (MEJ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?