Gormley v. Nike, Inc.

Filing 42

ORDER Re Expert Disclosures And Reports (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

COOLEY LLP
MICHELLE C. DOOLIN (179445) ([e-mail])
JENNIFER M. FRENCH (265422) ([e-mail])
4401 Eastgate Mall
San Diego, Ca 92121
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
COOLEY LLP
BEATRIZ MEJIA (190948) ([e-mail])
MATTHEW M. BROWN (264817) ([e-mail])
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, Ca 94111-5800
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10

Attorneys for Defendants
NIKE, INC; NIKE USA, INC. AND
NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

DUSTIN GORMLEY, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

17
Plaintiffs,

Coordinated Case No. 11-cv-00893-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS

18
v.
19
NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation,
20

Judge:
Place:

Hon. Susan Illston
Courtroom 10, 19th Floor

Defendant.
21
22

ERIKA MCCARTNEY, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated,

23
Plaintiff,
24
v.
25
26
27

NIKE, Inc., an Oregon corporation; and
DOES 2 through 20,
Defendants.

28
COOLEY LLP

COORDINATED CASE NO. 11-CV-00893-SI

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS

1
2

KRISTEN L. HARTMAN, an individual, on
behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated,

3

Plaintiff,

4
5
6

v.
NIKE USA, INC., an Oregon Corporation;
NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC., an Oregon
Corporation, and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,

7
Defendants.
8
9
10

Plaintiffs Dustin Gormley, Erika McCartney, and Kristen L. Hartman (“plaintiffs”) and

11

defendants Nike, Inc., Nike USA, Inc. and Nike Retail Services, Inc. (“Nike”), by and through

12

their respective counsel, jointly submit the following Stipulation re Class Expert Disclosures and

13

Reports as follows:

14

RECITAL

15

WHEREAS, via Civil Pretrial Minutes filed August 2, 2011 (ECF No. 33), the Honorable

16

Susan Illston set plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification for hearing on May 18, 2012, and set

17

the briefing schedule as follows: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification due on March 23,

18

2012; Defendants’ opposition brief due on April 20, 2012, and Plaintiffs’ reply brief due on May

19

4, 2012;

20
21

STIPULATION
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED

AND

AGREED, by the parties, through their

22

respective counsel of record, that Nike and plaintiffs will simultaneously disclose experts and

23

produce expert reports (if any) with regard to class certification on the dates designated below:

24
25
26

1.

February 10, 2012:

Class Expert Disclosures and Reports for Affirmative

Experts;
2.

March 9, 2012: Class Expert Disclosures and Reports for Rebuttal Experts.

27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1.

COORDINATED CASE NO. 11-CV-00893-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3

Dated: October 21, 2011

4
5

COOLEY LLP
MICHELLE C. DOOLIN
BEATRIZ MEJIA
JENNIFER M. FRENCH
MATTHEW M. BROWN

6
/s/ Beatriz Mejia
Beatriz Mejia

7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
NIKE, INC., NIKE USA, INC., AND NIKE RETAIL
SERVICES, INC.

9
10
11

Dated: October 21, 2011

12
13

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR
H. TIM HOFFMAN
ARTHUR W. LAZEAR
CHAD A. SAUNDERS

14
15

/s/ Chad A. Saunders
Chad A. Saunders

16
17

Attorneys for Plaintiff
DUSTIN GORMLEY

18
19
20

Dated: October 21, 2011

PACIFIC JUSTICE CENTER
ROBERT B. HANCOCK
MELVIN B. PEARLSTON

21
22
23
24

/s/ Robert B. Hancock
Robert B. Hancock
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ERIKA MCCARTNEY

25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2.

COORDINATED CASE NO. 11-CV-00893-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS

1

Dated: October 21, 2011

2

FINEMAN & ASSOCIATES
NEIL B. FINEMAN

3
/s/ Neil B. Fineman
Neil B. Fineman

4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff
ERIKA MCCARTNEY

6
7
8
9

Dated: October 21, 2011

STONEBARGER LAW, APC
GENE J. STONEBARGER
RICHARD D. LAMBERT

10
11
12
13

/s/ Gene J. Stonebarger
Gene J. Stonebarger
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KRISTEN L. HARTMAN

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

3.

COORDINATED CASE NO. 11-CV-00893-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS

1

FILER’S ATTESTATION

2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that all

3

parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation re Expert Disclosures and Reports.

4
5

Dated: October 21, 2011

6
7
8

COOLEY LLP
MICHELLE C. DOOLIN
BEATRIZ MEJIA
JENNIFER M. FRENCH
MATTHEW M. BROWN
/s/ Matthew M. Brown
Matthew M. Brown

9
10

Attorneys for Defendants
NIKE, INC., NIKE USA, INC., and
NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.

11
12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
17

10/25/11
Dated: _____________________

________________________________________
The Hon. Susan Illston

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1240172 v2/SF

28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

4.

COORDINATED CASE NO. 11-CV-00893-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS

1

PROOF OF SERVICE
(FRCP 5)

2
3

I hereby certify that on October 21, 2011, I electronically filed the:

4

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Expert Disclosures And Reports

5

with the clerk using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the

6

following attorneys of record at the following listed email addresses:

7

Michelle Carrie Doolin
[e-mail]

8
9
10

Beatriz Mejia
[e-mail]
Jennifer Michele French
[e-mail]

11
12
13

Matthew Michael Brown
[e-mail]
H. Tim Hoffman
[e-mail]

14
15
16

Neil Burnstein Fineman
[e-mail]
Chad A. Saunders
[e-mail]

17
18
19

Gene J. Stonebarger
[e-mail]
Newman Guthrie Strawbridge
[e-mail]

20
21
22

Richard David Lambert
[e-mail]
Robert Bothne Hancock
[e-mail]

23
24

I am personally and readily familiar with the business practice of Cooley LLP for collection and

25

processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and I caused such

26

envelopes with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States Postal Service at

27

San Francisco, California, on the following parties in this action:

28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

5.

COORDINATED CASE NO. 11-CV-00893-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND REPORTS