Gormley v. Nike, Inc.

Filing 47

WRONG DOCUMENT ATTACHED IN ERROR(tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011) Modified on 11/16/2011 (tf, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

BLACK CHANG & HAMILL LLP
Bradford J. Black (SBN 252031)
[e-mail]
Peter H. Chang (SBN 241467)
[e-mail]
Andrew G. Hamill (SBN 251156)
[e-mail]
333 Bush Street, Suite 2250
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
415-813-6210
Facsimile:
415-813-6222

JONES DAY
Behrooz Shariati (SBN 174436)
[e-mail]
Laurie M. Charrington (SBN 229679)
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-739-3900
Attorneys for Plaintiff
XILINX, INC.

Attorneys for Defendants

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13
14

Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18
19

Case No.: 3:11-cv-0671-SI

XILINX, INC.,

v.

STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
HEARING SCHEDULE

INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC and
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING SCHEDULE

3:11-CV-0671-SI

1

Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual

2

Ventures II LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), hereby make the following stipulated request through

3

their respective counsel of record:

4

WHEREAS, a motion hearing for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Xilinx’s Second Amended

5

Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (Dkt. No. 105) is currently set for December 2, 2011, at 9:00

6

a.m.;

7

WHEREAS, in a related case, Xilinx, Inc v. Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC et. al.,

8

No. 3:11-cv-04407-SI, a motion hearing for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Xilinx’s First Amended

9

Complaint (Dkt. No. 60) is currently set for January 20, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.;

10
11
12

WHEREAS, hearing both motions at the same time would be more convenient to the Court
and to the parties and a more efficient use of judicial resources;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED AND STIPULATED by the Parties,

13

through their respective counsel of record that the date and time for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

14

Xilinx’s Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (Dkt. No. 105) in this matter be re-

15

scheduled for January 20, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

16

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

17
18
19

Respectfully submitted,

20
21

Dated: November 14, 2011

BLACK CHANG & HAMILL LLP
Bradford J. Black

22
23

By:

24

/s/
Bradford J. Black

Attorneys for Defendants

25
26
27
28

Dated: November 14, 2011

JONES DAY
Behrooz Shariati
-2-

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING SCHEDULE

3:11-CV-0671-SI

1

/s/
Behrooz Shariati

By:

2
3

Attorneys for Plaintiff

4
5
Attestation

6
7

I, Bradford J. Black, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from

8

Behrooz Shariati, counsel for Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing

9

is true and correct. Executed this 14th day of November 2011 in San Francisco, California.

10
/s/
Bradford J. Black

11
12
13

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

14
15
16
17

Dated:

11/15/11

By:
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING SCHEDULE

3:11-CV-0671-SI