Gonzalez et al v. Simplexgrinell LP

Filing 58

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/6/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 JOSE GONZALEZ, GIRARD PLAIR, and 11 ANDREW NEWTON, No. C 11-00900 RS 12 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 13 Plaintiffs, v. 14 SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP, and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive, 15 16 17 18 Defendants. ____________________________________/ Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a 19 Case Management Conference on March 6, 2014. After considering the Joint Case Management 20 Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and 21 good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 22 1. 23 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. The parties are hereby REFERRED to a randomly ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. 24 assigned Magistrate Judge for the purpose of engaging in a settlement conference, to take place, 25 ideally, within the next 90 days. 26 2. NOTICE TO THE CLASS. 27 28 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 1 2 The parties are directed to meet and confer regarding notice to the class and submit a proposal thereon to the court on or before March 20, 2014. 3 3. 4 The parties are directed to meet and confer regarding further scheduling through trial and 5 6 FURTHER SCHEDULING. submit a proposed schedule to the court on or before March 20, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 DATED: March 6, 2014 _______________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?