Gilmer v. Asture
Filing
18
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/7/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)
1
2
3
4
MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, SBN CA 189450
Special Assistant United States Attorney
5
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8943
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Theophous.Reagans@ssa.gov
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ROBERT E. GILMER,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of
)
Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________)
CIVIL NO. 3:11CV00901 MEJ
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; PROPOSED
ORDER
19
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the approval
21
of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time up and through November 14, 2011, in
22
which to e-file his Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is requested because counsel for
23
Defendant needs additional time to review the case.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
///
1
/s/ Rosemary Dady
(As authorized via telephone on 10/05/11)
ROSEMARY DADY
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: October 6, 2011
2
3
JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
4
5
6
7
Dated: October 6, 2011
8
By:
/s/ Theophous H. Reagans
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
14
October 7, 2011
Dated: __________________
_____________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?