Gilmer v. Asture

Filing 18

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/7/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, SBN CA 189450 Special Assistant United States Attorney 5 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8943 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Theophous.Reagans@ssa.gov 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ROBERT E. GILMER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) CIVIL NO. 3:11CV00901 MEJ STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; PROPOSED ORDER 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the approval 21 of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time up and through November 14, 2011, in 22 which to e-file his Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is requested because counsel for 23 Defendant needs additional time to review the case. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// /// 1 /s/ Rosemary Dady (As authorized via telephone on 10/05/11) ROSEMARY DADY Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: October 6, 2011 2 3 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 4 5 6 7 Dated: October 6, 2011 8 By: /s/ Theophous H. Reagans THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant United States Attorney 9 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 14 October 7, 2011 Dated: __________________ _____________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?