Gilmer v. Asture

Filing 20

Stipuation and Order REMANDING CASE. Signed by Chief Magistrate MARIA-ELENA JAMES on 11/16/11. (bjtS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, SBN CA 189450 Special Assistant United States Attorney 5 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8943 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Theophous.Reagans@ssa.gov 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ROBERT E. GILMER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) CIVIL NO. 3:11CV00901 MEJ STIPULATION FOR REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND PROPOSED ORDER 19 20 The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, with the Court’s approval as indicated by issuance of the 21 attached Order, that the above-referenced case be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for 22 further administrative proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. section 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to issue a favorable 23 24 decision finding Plaintiff met Listing 12.03 as of 2003. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 /s/Kelly Dunn (As authorized via telephone) KELLY DUNN Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: November 14, 2011 2 3 MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 4 5 6 7 Dated: November 14, 2011 8 By: /s/ Theophous H. Reagans THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant United States Attorney 9 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 14 November 16, 2011 Dated: __________________ _____________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?