Provine v. Office Depot, Inc.

Filing 72

USCA Mandate (12-80218): In the absence of a timely motion for reinstatement, each party shall bear itsown fees and costs on appeal. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of thiscourt. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2013)

Download PDF
Case: 12-80218 05/07/2013 ID: 8618972 DktEntry: 6 Page: 1 of 2 FILED MAY 07 2013 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HOWARD DAVID PROVINE, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff - Respondent, MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS No. 12-80218 D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00903-SI Northern District of California, San Francisco v. ORDER OFFICE DEPOT, INC., Defendant - Petitioner. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this petition is dismissed without prejudice to reinstatement in the event the district court declines to approve respondent’s motions for preliminary or final approval of the class action settlement or upon any appeal of the final approval order. Petitioner may file a motion to reinstate the petition with this court within 28 days of an order by the district court denying a motion to approve the parties’ settlement or upon an appeal of the settlement order. In the absence of a timely motion for reinstatement, each party shall bear its own fees and costs on appeal. KN/MOATT Case: 12-80218 05/07/2013 ID: 8618972 DktEntry: 6 Page: 2 of 2 This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. FOR THE COURT: MOLLY C. DWYER CLERK OF COURT By: Kamon Naddaf Deputy Clerk KN/MOATT 2 12-80218

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?