Oracle Corporation et al v. Druglogic, Inc.

Filing 291

ORDER TO FILE DOCKET No. 290 UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on October 16, 2013. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ORACLE CORPORATION, et al.,

Case No. C-11-00910 JCS

Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10

DRUGLOGIC, INC.,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

DRUGLOGIC, INC.,
Counterclaimant,

13
14
15
16

ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL
COURT’S ORDER RE DRUGLOGIC’S
MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT
TESTIMONY OF BRIAN K. PERRY
AND ORACLE’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF
COMPLAINT (DECLARATORY
JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT
OF ‘091 PATENT)

v.
ORACLE, CORP, INC., et al.,
Counterclaim Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

The Court hereby ORDERS that its October 16, 2013 Order [Docket No. 290] is under
seal. The Court intends to publish the entire opinion in the public record within thirty (30) days of
the date of this Order. If any party believes that the Court’s opinion contains any confidential
information entitled to protection, that party shall file with the Court a declaration establishing
such entitlement and any proposed redactions not later than 21 days from the date of this Order.
The Court notes that the standard for sealing any portion of its opinion is high because of the
strong presumption in favor of public access that adheres to judicial documents. Kamakana v.
City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). In the case of a decision on
the merits, a party can overcome this presumption only by articulating compelling reasons

1
2

supported by specific facts. Id.
IT IS SO ORDERED

3
4

Dated: October 16, 2013
________________________
Joseph C. Spero
United States Magistrate Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2