Oracle Corporation et al v. Druglogic, Inc.

Filing 291

ORDER TO FILE DOCKET No. 290 UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on October 16, 2013. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ORACLE CORPORATION, et al., Case No. C-11-00910 JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 DRUGLOGIC, INC., Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 DRUGLOGIC, INC., Counterclaimant, 13 14 15 16 ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL COURT’S ORDER RE DRUGLOGIC’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF BRIAN K. PERRY AND ORACLE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF COMPLAINT (DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF ‘091 PATENT) v. ORACLE, CORP, INC., et al., Counterclaim Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court hereby ORDERS that its October 16, 2013 Order [Docket No. 290] is under seal. The Court intends to publish the entire opinion in the public record within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. If any party believes that the Court’s opinion contains any confidential information entitled to protection, that party shall file with the Court a declaration establishing such entitlement and any proposed redactions not later than 21 days from the date of this Order. The Court notes that the standard for sealing any portion of its opinion is high because of the strong presumption in favor of public access that adheres to judicial documents. Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). In the case of a decision on the merits, a party can overcome this presumption only by articulating compelling reasons 1 2 supported by specific facts. Id. IT IS SO ORDERED 3 4 Dated: October 16, 2013 ________________________ Joseph C. Spero United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?