Ingrid & Isabel, LLC v. Carey et al
Filing
46
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Ingrid & Isabel, LLC against Bellybandsforpregnancy.com, Diana Li, To the extent the motion seeks entry of default judgment against Defendants and entry of a permanent injunction, the motion is hereby GRANTED, and De fendants, together with their officer, agents, servants, employees, representatives, successors, attorneys, assigns, dbas, alter egos, affiliates, and all other persons, firms or companies acting in concert or participation with them, are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from:(see judgment for specifics). (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
INGRID & ISABEL, LLC,
No. CV- 11 - 0914 MMC
6
7
Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
8
v.
9
LENESHA CAREY, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
/
12
() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues
13
have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
14
(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The
15
issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
17
1. To the extent the motion seeks entry of default judgment against Defendants and
18
entry of a permanent injunction, the motion is hereby GRANTED, and
19
Defendants, together with their officer, agents, servants, employees,
20
representatives, successors, attorneys, assigns, dbas, alter egos, affiliates, and all
21
other persons, firms or companies acting in concert or participation with them, are
22
PERMANENTLY ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from:
23
a. Committing any further acts of infringement of plaintiff’s U.S. Patent
24
Nos. 7,181,775 and 7,676,852 (“the Patents”), and specifically, from making, using,
25
offering for sale, advertising, or selling Defendants’ Belly Band product;
26
b. Using any photographs or images on Defendants’ websites, advertising,
27
packaging, or marketing materials that describe, explain, show, demonstrate, or illustrate
28
1
the function of Defendants’ Belly Band product in a manner that suggest, induces, infers,
2
or indicates use that constitutes an infringement of the Patents;
c. Using plaintiff’s BELLABAND trademark, or any confusingly similar
3
4
name or trademark, in connection with advertising, promoting, selling, or distributing
5
maternity band or bell band products;
d. Purchasing, registering, or using BELLABAND as a user name, domain
6
7
name, keyword, or online advertising trigger;
e. Engaging in any online advertising or keyword advertising for maternity
8
9
10
bands or belly band products without the term BELLABAND as a “negative match”
keyword;
f. Promoting Defendants’ websites or products by using BELLABAND or
11
12
similar terms in the source code or their online advertising, or in meta tags, or in any way
13
to trigger the retrieval or online search ranking of their websites; and
g. Assisting, aiding, or abetting any other person or business entity in
14
15
engaging in or performing any of the activities referred to in paragraphs (1) through (6)
16
above.
17
2. To the extent the motion seeks further relief, the motion is hereby DENIED.
18
19
Dated: December 1, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
20
21
By: Tracy Lucero
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?