Benbahmed v. United Healthcare Insurance Company

Filing 41

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WILTH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5//7/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-00919-CRB Document40-1 Filed05/02/13 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 LISA S. KANTOR (State Bar No. 110678) Email: lkantor@kantorlaw.net J. DAVID OSWALT (State Bar No. 73439) Email: doswalt(2)kantorlaw.net KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, California 91324 Telephone: (818) 886-2525 Facsimile: (818)350-6272 Attorneys for Plaintiff SOFIA BENBAHMED DAVID M. HUMISTON (State Bar No. 90579) Email: david.hum i ston (ajsedgwick. com SEDGWICK LLP 801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-5556 Telephone: (213)426-6900 Facsimile: (213)426-6921 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY and U.S. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN, CALIFORNIA 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SOFIA BENBAHMED, 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, vs. Case No. CV 11-0919 CRB [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, and U.S. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN, CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA/1026243vl -1- Case No. CV 11-0919 CRB [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Case3:11-cv-00919-CRB Document40-1 Filed05/02/13 Page2 of 2 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-referenced action shall be 2 dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. The parties are to bear their own 3 attorneys' fees and costs. UNIT ED 6 7 8 harle Judge C 11 A H ER LI RT 10 yer s R. Bre NO 9 R NIA May 7, 2013 RT U O Dated: S 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA l ion. Charles R. Breyer United ORDERED States District IS SO IT FO 4 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 98 LA/1026243vl Case No. CV 11-0919 CRB -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?