Benbahmed v. United Healthcare Insurance Company
Filing
41
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WILTH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5//7/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2013)
Case3:11-cv-00919-CRB Document40-1 Filed05/02/13 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
LISA S. KANTOR (State Bar No. 110678)
Email: lkantor@kantorlaw.net
J. DAVID OSWALT (State Bar No. 73439)
Email: doswalt(2)kantorlaw.net
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
Telephone: (818) 886-2525
Facsimile: (818)350-6272
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SOFIA BENBAHMED
DAVID M. HUMISTON (State Bar No. 90579)
Email: david.hum i ston (ajsedgwick. com
SEDGWICK LLP
801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-5556
Telephone: (213)426-6900
Facsimile: (213)426-6921
Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED HEALTHCARE
INSURANCE COMPANY and
U.S. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
PLAN, CALIFORNIA
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SOFIA BENBAHMED,
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. CV 11-0919 CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
UNITED HEALTHCARE
INSURANCE COMPANY, and U.S.
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN,
CALIFORNIA,
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA/1026243vl
-1-
Case No. CV 11-0919 CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Case3:11-cv-00919-CRB Document40-1 Filed05/02/13 Page2 of 2
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-referenced action shall be
2
dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. The parties are to bear their own
3
attorneys' fees and costs.
UNIT
ED
6
7
8
harle
Judge C
11
A
H
ER
LI
RT
10
yer
s R. Bre
NO
9
R NIA
May 7, 2013
RT
U
O
Dated:
S
5
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
l ion. Charles R. Breyer
United ORDERED
States District
IS SO
IT
FO
4
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
98
LA/1026243vl
Case No. CV 11-0919 CRB
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?