Ramirez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 13

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 03/16/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2011)

Download PDF
Ramirez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NICK PACHECO LAW GROUP, APC NICK PACHECO, ESQ. (SBN 173391) 15501 San Fernando Mission Blvd., Suite 110 Mission Hills, CA 91345 Telephone No.: (888)-888-8641 Facsimile No.: (800)-210-0028 Attorney for Defendant Rosalba Ramirez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., also known ) ) as Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells ) Fargo Bank, N.A., formerly known as ) Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, formerly known as ) World Savings Bank, FSB; ETS SERVICES, ) LLC; SIMONICH CORPORATION dba ) BWC MORTGAGE SERVICES, a business ) entity form unknown and DOES 1 through ) ) 100 Inclusive. ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ______________________________________ ) ROSALBA RAMIREZ, an individual, Case No.: 11-cv-00985-TEH [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1) Hon. Thelton E. Henderson Action Filed: Dec. 15, 2010 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 THIS MATTER came before the Court to be considered. The Court accepts the request and finds that the case should be dismissed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED the case be dismissed without prejudice. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNIT ED 03/16/2011 Dated: ________________ _____________________________ Honorable Thelton E. Henderson Ju lton E. dge The so Hender n S 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1) A C LI FO R NIA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?