Lotes Co, LTD v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, Ltd et al

Filing 66

ORDER GRANTING 65 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule. Opposition due by 11/11/2011. Replies due by 11/25/2011.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/9/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-01036-JSW Document65 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Gregory L. Lippetz (Bar No. 154228) glippetz@jonesday.com Laurie M. Charrington (Bar No. 229679) lmcharrington@jonesday.com JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: 650-739-3939 Facsimile: 650-739-3900 Filed11/07/11 Page1 of 3 James Chadwick (Bar No. 157114) jchadwick@sheppardmullin.com Darren M. Franklin (Bar No. 210939) dfranklin@sheppardmullin.com Nathaniel Bruno (Bar No. 228118) nbruno@sheppardmullin.com Tenaya M. Rodewald (Bar No. 248563) trodewald@sheppardmullin.com SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 390 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: 650-815-2600 Facsimile: 650-2601 Daniel T. Conrad (Bar No. 24026608) (Pro Hac Vice) dtconrad@jonesday.com JONES DAY 2727 N. Hardwood Street Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: 214-220-3939 Facsimile: 214-969-5100 10 11 12 13 14 Arthur P. Licygiewicz (Bar No. 0068458) (Pro Hac Vice) aplicygiewicz@jonesday.com JONES DAY North Point 901 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, OH 44114-1190 Telephone: 216-586-3939 Facsimile: 216-579-0212 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendants HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. and FOXCONN ELECTRONICS, INC. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 21 22 LOTES CO., LTD., a Taiwan Corporation, 23 24 25 26 Case No. 5:11-CV-01036 JSW Plaintiff, v. HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD., a Taiwan Corporation, and FOXCONN ELECTRONICS, INC., a California Corporation, SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ; ORDER AS MODIFIED Date: January 6, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m. Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White 27 Defendants. 28 -1- SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01036 JSW Case3:11-cv-01036-JSW Document65 1 Filed11/07/11 Page2 of 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Lotes Co. Ltd (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Hon Hai 2 Precision Industry Co. Ltd. And Foxconn Electronics, Inc. (“Defendants”) jointly submit this 3 stipulated request for an extension of time to file and serve Defendants’ opposition brief 4 regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Stay and Setting of Hearing Schedule for Partial Summary 5 Judgment Motions. 6 7 8 9 The parties have agreed to extend the date for Defendants’ opposition and for Plaintiff’s reply. The parties’ proposed revised briefing schedule is as follows: November 11, 2011 November 25 December 2, 2011 Deadline to file Opposition Brief Deadline to file Reply Brief 10 January 6, 2012 11 This extended briefing schedule would not affect the currently noticed hearing date of 12 13 14 Hearing January 6, 2012 and would have no other effect on the current case schedule. This request for an extension is supported by the Declaration of Gregory L. Lippetz being filed concurrently herewith. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 Dated: November 7, 2011 JONES DAY 17 18 19 20 21 By: s/ Gregory L. Lippetz_____ Gregory L. Lippetz Counsel for Defendants HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO. LTD., and FOXCONN ELECTRONICS, INC. 22 23 In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the above signatory attests that 24 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. 25 26 27 28 -2- SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01036 JSW Case3:11-cv-01036-JSW Document65 1 Dated: November 7, 2011 2 SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP By: 3 Filed11/07/11 Page3 of 3 /s/ James Chadwick________ James Chadwick 4 Counsel for Plaintiff LOTES CO. LTD. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. AS MODIFIED ABOVE. 8 9 November 9, 2011 DATED: _____________________ 10 By____________________________ Hon Jeffrey S. White 11 12 13 14 15 SVI-99401v1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01036 JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?