Lotes Co, LTD v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, Ltd et al
Filing
66
ORDER GRANTING 65 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule. Opposition due by 11/11/2011. Replies due by 11/25/2011.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/9/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2011)
Case3:11-cv-01036-JSW Document65
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Gregory L. Lippetz (Bar No. 154228)
glippetz@jonesday.com
Laurie M. Charrington (Bar No. 229679)
lmcharrington@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: 650-739-3939
Facsimile: 650-739-3900
Filed11/07/11 Page1 of 3
James Chadwick (Bar No. 157114)
jchadwick@sheppardmullin.com
Darren M. Franklin (Bar No. 210939)
dfranklin@sheppardmullin.com
Nathaniel Bruno (Bar No. 228118)
nbruno@sheppardmullin.com
Tenaya M. Rodewald (Bar No. 248563)
trodewald@sheppardmullin.com
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER &
HAMPTON LLP
390 Lytton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: 650-815-2600
Facsimile: 650-2601
Daniel T. Conrad (Bar No. 24026608)
(Pro Hac Vice)
dtconrad@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
2727 N. Hardwood Street
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: 214-220-3939
Facsimile: 214-969-5100
10
11
12
13
14
Arthur P. Licygiewicz (Bar No. 0068458)
(Pro Hac Vice)
aplicygiewicz@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
North Point
901 Lakeside Avenue
Cleveland, OH 44114-1190
Telephone: 216-586-3939
Facsimile: 216-579-0212
15
16
17
Attorneys for Defendants
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO.,
LTD. and FOXCONN ELECTRONICS,
INC.
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
21
22
LOTES CO., LTD., a Taiwan Corporation,
23
24
25
26
Case No. 5:11-CV-01036 JSW
Plaintiff,
v.
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO.,
LTD., a Taiwan Corporation, and FOXCONN
ELECTRONICS, INC., a California
Corporation,
SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST
TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ;
ORDER AS MODIFIED
Date:
January 6, 2012
Time:
9:00 a.m.
Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White
27
Defendants.
28
-1-
SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO
MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01036 JSW
Case3:11-cv-01036-JSW Document65
1
Filed11/07/11 Page2 of 3
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Lotes Co. Ltd (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Hon Hai
2
Precision Industry Co. Ltd. And Foxconn Electronics, Inc. (“Defendants”) jointly submit this
3
stipulated request for an extension of time to file and serve Defendants’ opposition brief
4
regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Stay and Setting of Hearing Schedule for Partial Summary
5
Judgment Motions.
6
7
8
9
The parties have agreed to extend the date for Defendants’ opposition and for Plaintiff’s
reply. The parties’ proposed revised briefing schedule is as follows:
November 11, 2011
November 25
December 2, 2011
Deadline to file Opposition Brief
Deadline to file Reply Brief
10
January 6, 2012
11
This extended briefing schedule would not affect the currently noticed hearing date of
12
13
14
Hearing
January 6, 2012 and would have no other effect on the current case schedule.
This request for an extension is supported by the Declaration of Gregory L. Lippetz being
filed concurrently herewith.
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
16
Dated: November 7, 2011
JONES DAY
17
18
19
20
21
By:
s/ Gregory L. Lippetz_____
Gregory L. Lippetz
Counsel for Defendants
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY
CO. LTD., and FOXCONN
ELECTRONICS, INC.
22
23
In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the above signatory attests that
24
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.
25
26
27
28
-2-
SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO
MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01036 JSW
Case3:11-cv-01036-JSW Document65
1
Dated: November 7, 2011
2
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER &
HAMPTON LLP
By:
3
Filed11/07/11 Page3 of 3
/s/ James Chadwick________
James Chadwick
4
Counsel for Plaintiff
LOTES CO. LTD.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED. AS MODIFIED ABOVE.
8
9
November 9, 2011
DATED: _____________________
10
By____________________________
Hon Jeffrey S. White
11
12
13
14
15
SVI-99401v1
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO
MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01036 JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?