Masterobjects, Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

Filing 29

ORDER rescheduling CMC re 27 Stipulation filed by Amazon.Com, Inc. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/12/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/10/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-01055-CRB Document27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985) nchatterjee@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: +1-650-614-7400 Facsimile: +1-650-614-7401 JEFFREY L. COX (admitted Pro Hac Vice) jcox@orrick.com RANJIT NARAYANAN (admitted Pro Hac Vice) rnarayanan@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5700 Seattle, WA 98401 Telephone: +1-206-839-4300 Facsimile: +1-206-839-4301 Attorneys for Defendant AMAZON.COM, INC. DIANE SUE RICE drice@hosielaw.com SPENCER HOSIE shosie@hosielaw.com GEORGE F. BISHOP gbishop@hosielaw.com WILLIAM PATRICK NELSON wnelson@hosielaw.com HOSIE RICE LLP Transamerica Pyramid 600 Montgomery Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-247-6000 Facsimile: 415-247-6001 Attorneys for MASTEROBJECTS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 22 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 23 24 MASTEROBJECTS, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 25 26 27 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SILICON VALLEY Filed06/08/11 Page1 of 5 v. AMAZON.COM, INC., Defendant/Counter-Claimant. Case No. CV 11-01055 CRB STIPULATED REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CMC CASE NO. CV11-01055 CRB Case3:11-cv-01055-CRB Document27 Filed06/08/11 Page2 of 5 1 2 1. WHEREAS, other pending cases in this District, including MasterObjects v. 3 Google, Inc., Case No. CV 11-01054 PJH (“the Google case”), involve the same patent at issue in 4 the instant case and were brought by the same plaintiff, MasterObjects, Inc. (“MasterObjects), as 5 in the instant case. 6 2. WHEREAS on June 3, 2010, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 3-12 and 7-11, 7 Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases 8 Should Be Related (“Amazon’s Motion To Relate”), seeking to relate the instant case to the 9 Google case. (Case No. CV 11-01054 PJH, Dkt. Nos. 15-17). 10 11 3. WHEREAS United States District Judge Hamilton, presiding in the Google case, has not yet ruled on Amazon’s Motion To Relate. 12 4. WHEREAS, on June 6, 2011, the Court Staff issued a Notice of Electronic Filing 13 or Other Case Activity in the Google case, stating “Deadlines terminated.” (Case No. CV 11- 14 01054 PJH, Docket text dated 6/6/2011). 15 5. WHEREAS, to avoid the burden – both on the Court and the parties – of preparing 16 for and participating in a Case Management Conference in the instant case that may be rendered 17 superfluous by Judge Hamilton’s ruling, the parties respectfully request that the Case 18 Management Conference be rescheduled for July 8, 2011, or another date specified by the Court. 19 20 21 6. WHEREAS the following changes have previously been made to deadlines in this case:  Deadlines in the case were terminated on March 3, 2011, after the parties declined 22 to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge and requested reassignment to a United 23 States District Judge. (Docket text dated 3/3/2011). 24  An Extension of Time to Answer was granted on March 31, 2011. (Dkt. No. 10). 25 26 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the 27 parties appearing below through their undersigned respective attorneys of record, based on the 28 foregoing, and subject to the approval of this Court, that: ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SILICON VALLEY -1- JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CMC CASE NO. CV11-01055 CRB Case3:11-cv-01055-CRB Document27 1 2 3 4 a. Filed06/08/11 Page3 of 5 Rescheduling the Case Management Conference to July 8, 2011 will have no appreciable effect on the schedule for the case. b. The Case Management Conference in this case, currently scheduled for June 17, 8:30 a.m. 2011, be rescheduled to ________________, 2011, at _________. August 12 5 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 ER R NIA FO J H 14 RT 13 . Breyer arles R udge Ch NO 12 I LI 11 _____________________________________ Honorable Charles R. Breyer ERED D United States District O OR T IS S Judge UNIT ED 10 DATED: _________________ August 10, 2011 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 9 S 8 A 7 N F D IS T IC T O R C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SILICON VALLEY JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CMC CASE NO. CV11-01055 CRB Case3:11-cv-01055-CRB Document27 1 2 3 Submitted by: Dated: June 8, 2011 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for AMAZON.COM, INC. 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 /s/ I. Neel Chatterjee /s/ JEFFREY L. COX (admitted Pro Hac Vice) jcox@orrick.com RANJIT NARAYANAN (admitted Pro Hac Vice) rnarayanan@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5700 Seattle, WA 98401 Telephone: +1-206-839-4300 Facsimile: +1-206-839-4301 8 15 By: I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985) nchatterjee@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: +1-650-614-7400 Facsimile: +1-650-614-7401 4 14 Filed06/08/11 Page4 of 5 Dated: June 8, 2011 By: /s/ Spencer Hosie /s/ DIANE SUE RICE drice@hosielaw.com SPENCER HOSIE shosie@hosielaw.com GEORGE F. BISHOP gbishop@hosielaw.com WILLIAM PATRICK NELSON wnelson@hosielaw.com HOSIE RICE LLP Transamerica Pyramid 600 Montgomery Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-247-6000 Facsimile: 415-247-6001 Attorneys for MASTEROBJECTS, INC. 24 25 26 27 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SILICON VALLEY JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CMC CASE NO. CV11-01055 CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?