Heatherly et al v. Marisco's La Jaiba et al

Filing 12

ORDER Extending Time To Respond To Plaintiffs' Complaint and Extending Dates In Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 7/29/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)
THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,
A Professional Law Corporation
4328 Redwood Hwy., Suite 300
San Rafael, CA 94903
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415/674-9900
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DAREN HEATHERLY and IRMA RAMIREZ

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

DAREN HEATHERLY and IRMA RAMIREZ,

13
14
15
16
17

Case No.: CV 11-1069 MEJ
Unlimited Civil Matter

Plaintiffs,
v.

FOURTH STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME FOR DEFENDANT XU TRUONG
and ANH HOANG, TRUSTEES OF THE
TRUONG/HOANG FAMILY TRUST TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS'
COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DATES
IN SCHEDULING ORDER; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

MARISCO'S LA JAIBA; XU TRUONG and
AHN HOANG, TRUSTEES OF THE
TRUONG/HOANG FAMILY TRUST, U.D.T.
dated March 18, 1997; and MIGUEL PELAYO
MONTIEL, an individual dba MARISCO'S LA
JAIBA,

18
Defendants.
19
20

Plaintiffs DARREN HEATHERLY AND IRMA RAMIREZ (hereinafter "Plaintiffs") and

21

Defendants MARISCO'S LA JAIBA (hereinafter "Marisco's"); XU TRUONG and ANH HOANG

22

(erroneously sued herein as AHN HOANG), TRUSTEES OF THE TRUONG/HOANG FAMILY

23

TRUST, U.D.T. dated March 18, 1997 (hereinafter "Defendant Truong"); and MIGUEL PELAYO

24

MONTIEL, an individual dba MARISCO'S LA JAIBA (hereinafter "Montiel"), by and through their

25

respective counsel, respectfully request to make the following stipulation:

26

1.

WHEREAS, all Defendants have been served with the Summons and Complaint; and

27

2.

WHEREAS, Defendants Marisco's and Montiel have filed an Answer to the

28

Complaint; and
1
FOURTH STIP. EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND
EXTENDING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON - CV 11-1069 MEJ

1
2

3.

WHEREAS, the Court has entered three prior Orders extending the dates in the

Scheduling Order based on Stipulations agreed to by the parties.

3

4.

WHEREAS, the Court's July 15, 2011 Order extended the dates in the Scheduling

4

Order as follows:

5

Defendant Truong's response to the Complaint due July 28, 2011.

6

Parties to complete Initial Disclosures by July 29, 2011.

7

Parties to hold a joint inspection of the premises by August 5, 2011.

8

Parties to meet and confer in person to discuss settlement by August 15, 2011.

9

Plaintiff's file "Notice of Need for Mediation" by September 20, 2011.

10

5.

11

Plaintiffs.

12

6.

13
14

WHEREAS, on July 5, 2011, Defendant Truong made a written settlement offer to

WHEREAS, on July 20, 2011, Plaintiffs made a written counteroffer for settlement to

Defendant Truong.
7.

WHEREAS, Defendant Truong and Plaintiffs continue to actively attempt to negotiate

15

a settlement in the above-referenced case, and wish to reduce fees, costs and litigation expenses in

16

doing so.

17

8.

WHEREAS, the parties believe it would be in the interests of efficiency and economy

18

to extend the time for Defendant Truong to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and to further extend for

19

two weeks the dates in the July 15, 2011 Order.

20

IT IS STIPULATED that:

21

1.

22

Defendant Truong will have up to and including August 11, 2011 to respond to the

Complaint;

23

2.

The parties will complete initial disclosures by August 12, 2011;

24

3.

The parties will hold a joint inspection of the premises by August 19, 2011;

25

4.

The last day for the parties to meet and confer in person to discuss settlement is

26

August 29, 2011;

27
28
2
FOURTH STIP. EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND
EXTENDING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON - CV 11-1069 MEJ

1

5.

The last day for Plaintiffs to file "Notice of Need for Mediation" is October 4, 2011.

4

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,
A Professional Law Corporation
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DAREN HEATHERLY and IRMA RAMIREZ

5

By:

2

DATED: July 27, 2011

3

6

DATED: July 27, 2011

7
8

/s/ Thomas E. Frankovich
Thomas E. Frankovich

AARON & WILSON, LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
MARISCO'S LA JAIBA; MIGUEL PELAYO
MONTIEL, an individual dba MARISCO'S LA
JAIBA

9
By:
10
11

DATED: July 27, 2011

12
13
14

HATCHER & RUNDEL
Attorneys for Defendants
MARISCO'S LA JAIBA; MIGUEL PELAYO
MONTIEL, an individual dba MARISCO'S LA
JAIBA
By:

15
16

DATED: July 27, 2011

/s/ Robert S. Aaron
Robert S. Aaron

/s/ William W. Hatcher, Jr.
William W. Hatcher, Jr.

19

SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
XU TRUONG and ANH HOANG, Trustees of the
TRUONG/HOANG FAMILY TRUST, U.D.T. dated
March 18, 1997 (erroneously sued herein as AHN
HOANG)

20

By:

17
18

/s/ Mary P. Derner
Mary P. Derner

21
22
ORDER

23

IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant Truong will have up to and including August 11, 2011

24
25

to respond to the Complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties will complete initial disclosures by August 12,

26
27

2011;

28
3
FOURTH STIP. EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND
EXTENDING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON - CV 11-1069 MEJ

1
2
3
4
5
6

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties will hold a joint inspection of the premises by
August 19, 2011.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last day for the parties to meet and confer in person to
discuss settlement is August 29, 2011;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last day for Plaintiffs to file "Notice of Need for
Mediation" is October 4, 2011.

7
8

July 29
Dated: ________________, 2011

_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

FOURTH STIP. EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND
EXTENDING DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON - CV 11-1069 MEJ