Olympic Developments AG, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation et al

Filing 102

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE CASE C11-1080 JCS AND C11-4203 JCS. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 09/01/2011. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Eric A. Buresh (admitted pro hac vice) eburesh@shb.com Abe J. Kean (admitted pro hac vice) akean@shb.com SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP 2555 Grand Boulevard Kansas City, Missouri 64108-2613 Telephone: (816) 474-6550 Facsimile: (816) 421-5547 Andrew L. Chang (SBN: 222309) achang@shb.com SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP One Montgomery, Suite 2700 San Francisco, California 94104-4505 Telephone: (415) 544-1900 Facsimile: (415) 391-0281 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC and SONY ELECTRONICS INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 OLYMPIC DEVELOPMENTS AG, LLC, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC 20 Defendant. 21 22 25 26 Judge: Hon. Joseph C. Spero JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE CASE NO. 3:11-CV01080-JCS AND CASE NO. 3:11-CV04203-JSC OLYMPIC DEVELOPMENTS AG, LLC, Plaintiff, 23 24 Case No. 3:11-cv-01080-JCS v. SONY ELECTRONICS INC. Defendant. 27 28 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS JOINT STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE Case No. 3:11-cv-01080-JCS 1 1. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 42(a), Plaintiff 2 Olympic Developments AG, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Sony Computer Entertainment 3 America LLC (“SCEA”) and Sony Electronics Inc. (“SEL”) (collectively “the Parties”), by and 4 through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate, and respectfully request the Court to 5 enter an Order consolidating the above-captioned actions. This joint stipulation sets forth the 6 following facts upon which the Parties agree: 7 2. Plaintiff filed an action against SEL, SCEA, and several other defendants on 8 September 28, 2010 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging 9 patent infringement. 10 3. On February 18, 2011, Plaintiff and SEL along with two other defendants, Apple, Inc. 11 and barnesandnoble.com LLC, filed a Joint Stipulation and Motion to Sever and Transfer Plaintiff’s 12 Claims to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Case No. C-11- 13 01655 EJD, Doc. 85. The court granted the joint motion on February 28, 2011. 14 Following severance and transfer, Plaintiff and SEL, including Apple, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com 15 LLC, were docketed before Judge Edward J. Davila. 16 4. Id. at Doc. 89. On February 21, 2011, Plaintiff and SCEA filed a Joint Stipulation and Motion to 17 Sever and Transfer Plaintiff’s Claims to the United States District Court for the Northern District of 18 California. Doc. 63. The court granted the joint motion on February 28, 2011. Doc. 66. Following 19 severance and transfer, Plaintiff and SCEA were docketed before this Court (“SCEA Action”). 20 5. Since their respective transfers, the Parties have engaged in several meet and confer 21 discussions to join SEL in the SCEA Action. These discussions were described in subsequent filings 22 in the SCEA Action, in which the Parties stated that “Plaintiff, SCEA, and SEL have agreed that the 23 convenience of all parties and consistent and efficient judicial management would benefit from 24 removing Plaintiff’s and SEL’s claims from the [this] Action and asserting them in [the SCEA 25 Action].” Case No. 3:11-cv-01080-JCS, Docs. 91, 92. 26 27 6. On August 19, Plaintiff and SEL filed a Joint Stipulation to Sever Plaintiff’s Claims Against SEL, severing SEL from barnesandnoble.com LLC (Apple, Inc. had previously been 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE Case No. 3:11-cv-01080-JCS 1 dismissed pursuant to a settlement agreement). Case No. 11-cv-01655, Doc. 130. The court granted 2 the joint stipulation on August 23, 2011. Id. at Doc. 131. 3 7. In both the SCEA Action and the SEL Action, Plaintiff asserts claims of infringement 4 arising out of the same patents. In both actions, SCEA and SEL also assert counterclaims against 5 Plaintiff regarding the same patents. Both SCEA and SEL share the same counsel and are affiliated 6 corporations. 7 8 9 8. Consolidation will avoid unnecessary cost and delay, increase efficiencies for the Parties, and provide economies for the Court. 9. In order to avoid unnecessary motion practice and further expense of the Parties and 10 the Court’s resources, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, request an Order 11 consolidating the SEL Action and the SCEA Action for pretrial purposes. 12 REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE Case No. 3:11-cv-01080-JCS 1 10. WHEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate 2 to and request this Court to enter an Order consolidating Case No. 3:11-cv-01080-JCS and Case No. 3 3:11-cv-04203-JSC for pretrial purposes. 4 Dated: August 26, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 5 WHITE FIELD, INC. 6 By: /s/ Steven W. Ritcheson Steven W. Ritcheson ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF OLYMPIC DEVELOPMENTS AG, LLC 7 8 9 10 Dated: August 26, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 11 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON 12 By: /s/ Eric A. Buresh 13 Eric A. Buresh Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC and SONY ELECTRONICS INC. 14 15 16 Pursuant to General Order No. 45.X.B., the below filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above Signatories. 17 18 Dated: August 26, 2011 /s/ Andrew L. Chang _____________________ Andrew L. Chang 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. ER R NIA FO Spero LI Judge Jo H 27 RT 26 seph C. NO 25 ________________________________________ HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE A 24 09/01/2011 UNIT ED Dated: 23 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 22 S 21 N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE Case No. 3:11-cv-01080-JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?