Olympic Developments AG, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation et al

Filing 92

ORDER re 89 Stipulation and Order To Continue Pending Case Management and ADR Deadlines filed by Sony Computer Entertainment of America, LLC Case Management Conference set for 9/16/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 06/17/2011. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Eric A. Buresh (admitted pro hac vice) eburesh@shb.com Abe J. Kean (admitted pro hac vice) akean@shb.com SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP 2555 Grand Boulevard Kansas City, Missouri 64108-2613 Telephone: (816) 474-6550 Facsimile: (816) 421-5547 Andrew Chang (SBN: 222309) achang@shb.com SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP One Montgomery, Suite 2700 San Francisco, California 94104-4505 Telephone: (415) 544-1900 Facsimile: (415) 391-0281 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 OLYMPIC DEVELOPMENTS AG, LLC, 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC, Defendant. 22 23 24 27 28 Judge: Hon. Joseph C. Spero JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PENDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADR DEADLINES; DECLARATION OF ABRAN J. KEAN IN SUPPORT SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC, Counterclaimant, 25 26 Case No. C-11-01080 JCS v. OLYMPIC DEVELOPMENTS AG, LLC, Counterdefendant. JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES; KEAN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT – C-11-01080 JCS 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Olympic Developments AG, LLC (“Plaintiff”) 2 and Defendant Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC (“SCEA”) (jointly, the “Parties”) 3 stipulate and request that the Initial Case Management Conference and all other pending deadlines 4 set by this Court’s March 8, 2011 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR 5 Deadlines (Dkt 69) be continued as set forth below. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, this joint stipulation 6 is based on the accompanying declaration of Abran J. Kean, which sets forth the following facts 7 upon which the Parties agree: 8 1. In a separate action currently pending before the Honorable Edward J. Davila of this 9 Court, Olympic Developments AG, LLC v. Apple, Inc., et al., Northern District of California Case 10 No. C-11-016555 (the “SEL Action”), Plaintiff currently asserts claims against Sony Electronics Inc. 11 (“SEL”) and other defendants arising out of the same patents at issue in this action. In the SEL 12 Action, SEL also asserts counterclaims against Plaintiff regarding the same patents that are at issue 13 in SCEA’s counterclaims in this action. SEL’s counsel in the SEL Action is the same as SCEA’s 14 counsel in this action. 15 2. As contemplated in the Parties’ June 3, 2011 stipulation (Dkt 87), Plaintiff, SCEA, 16 and SEL have agreed that the convenience of all parties and consistent and efficient judicial 17 management would benefit from removing Plaintiff’s and SEL’s claims from the SEL Action and 18 asserting them in this action. 19 3. In order to permit time for the Parties to effectuate that rearranging of the claims in 20 both the SEL Action and this action, and to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort in this Court 21 after this case is at issue, the Parties request that the deadlines currently set by the Court’s March 8, 22 2011 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines be continued to track 23 similar deadlines currently set in the SEL Action, as follows: 24 (a) the last day to meet and confer regarding initial disclosures, early settlement, 25 ADR process selection, and a discovery plan, file the ADR Certification and file either the 26 Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference shall be continued 27 from June 17, 2011 to August 26, 2011; 28 -2JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES; KEAN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT – C-11-01080 JCS 1 (b) the last day to file a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures 2 or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement shall be 3 continued from June 17, 2011 to September 9, 2011; and 4 (c) the Initial Case Management Conference currently set in this case on June 24, 5 2011 at 1:30 PM be continued to September 16, 2011 at 1:30 PM or any later date or time 6 convenient to the Court. 7 4. 8 9 10 11 The following are the prior time modifications in the case, whether by stipulation or Court order: (a) On March 25, 2011, the Parties stipulated to extend SCEA’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint to April 25, 2011; (b) On April 25, 2011, the Court vacated the April 25, 2011 deadline for SCEA to 12 respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, instead permitting Plaintiff to file a Second 13 Amended Complaint that same day; and 14 15 16 (c) On June 3, 2011, the Parties stipulated to extend ADR deadlines for 14 days to June 17, 2011 to permit the Parties to finalize the agreement set forth above. REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES; KEAN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT – C-11-01080 JCS 1 WHEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to and 2 respectfully request this Court to enter an Order continue the pending case management and ADR 3 deadlines, as stated above. 4 5 Dated: June 16, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 6 WHITE FIELD, INC. 7 By: /s/ Steven W. Ritcheson Steven W. Ritcheson ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF OLYMPIC DEVELOPMENTS AG, LLC 8 9 10 11 Dated: June 16, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 12 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON 13 By: /s/ Eric A. Buresh Eric A. Buresh ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC and ATTORNEYS FOR NON-PARTY SONY ELECTRONICS INC. 14 15 16 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. R NIA HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO pero UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ph C. S dge Jose ER H 23 24 FO Ju LI RT 22 ________________________________________ NO 21 Dated: 06/17/11 A 20 UNIT ED 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C 25 26 27 28 -4JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES; KEAN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT – C-11-01080 JCS DECLARATION OF ABRAN J. KEAN 1 2 3 I, Abran J. Kean, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. and I am counsel 4 for Defendant, Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC (“SCEA”) in this action. I make this 5 declaration based on my own personal knowledge. I could and would testify to the matters set forth 6 if called upon to do so. 7 2. In a separate action currently pending before the Honorable Edward J. Davila of this 8 Court, Olympic Developments AG, LLC v. Apple, Inc., et al., Northern District of California Case 9 No. C-11-016555 (the “SEL Action”), Plaintiff currently asserts claims against Sony Electronics Inc. 10 (“SEL”) and other defendants arising out of the same patents at issue in this action. In the SEL 11 Action, SEL also asserts counterclaims against Plaintiff regarding the same patents that are at issue 12 in SCEA’s counterclaims in this action. SEL’s counsel in the SEL Action is the same as SCEA’s 13 counsel in this action. 14 3. As contemplated in the Parties’ June 3, 2011 stipulation (Dkt 87), Plaintiff, SCEA, 15 and SEL have agreed that the convenience of all parties and consistent and efficient judicial 16 management would benefit from removing Plaintiff’s and SEL’s claims from the SEL Action and 17 asserting them in this action. 18 4. In order to permit time for the Parties to effectuate that rearranging of the claims in 19 both the SEL Action and this action, and to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort in this Court 20 after this case is at issue, the Parties request that the deadlines currently set by the Court’s March 8, 21 2011 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines be continued to track 22 similar deadlines currently set in the SEL Action, as follows: 23 (a) the last day to meet and confer regarding initial disclosures, early settlement, 24 ADR process selection, and a discovery plan, file the ADR Certification and file either the 25 Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference shall be continued 26 from June 17, 2011 to August 26, 2011; 27 28 -5JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES; KEAN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT – C-11-01080 JCS 1 (b) the last day to file a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures 2 or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement shall be 3 continued from June 17, 2011 to September 9, 2011; and 4 (c) the Initial Case Management Conference currently set in this case on June 24, 5 2011 at 1:30 PM be continued to September 16, 2011 at 1:30 PM or any later date or time 6 convenient to the Court. 7 5. 8 9 10 11 The following are the prior time modifications in the case, whether by stipulation or Court order: (a) On March 25, 2011, the Parties stipulated to extend SCEA’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint to April 25, 2011; (b) On April 25, 2011, the Court vacated the April 25, 2011 deadline for SCEA to 12 respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, instead permitting Plaintiff to file a Second 13 Amended Complaint that same day; and 14 15 (c) On June 3, 2011, the Parties stipulated to extend ADR deadlines for 14 days to June 17, 2011 to permit the Parties to finalize the agreement set forth above. 16 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and 17 correct and that this affidavit was executed in Kansas City, Missouri on June 16, 2011. 18 19 ___________/s/ Abran J. Kean________ ABRAN J. KEAN 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pursuant to General Order No. 45.X.B., the below filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above Signatories. Dated: June 16, 2011 _______/s/ Andrew L. Chang__________ Andrew L. Chang 26 27 28 -6JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES; KEAN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT – C-11-01080 JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?