Yount -v- City and County of San Francisco

Filing 46

THIRD ORDER FOR PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/30/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 Northern District of California 6 7 KATHY YOUNT, ESTATE OF DYLAN YOUNT, 8 Plaintiffs, 9 10 v. No. C 11-1141 MEJ THIRD ORDER RE: JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 13 14 On May 16, 2013, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer in good faith and file a 15 joint statement by May 30, 2013. Of the 28 facts in Defendants’ initial proposed joint statement, it 16 appears that the parties have now reached an agreement as to 27 facts. See Margolis and Pederson 17 Decl., ¶ 7, Dkt. No. 45. However, it appears that Plaintiffs’ counsel seeks to add 2 additional facts 18 which Defendants dispute. This is not the purpose of a joint statement of undisputed facts. 19 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to file the joint statement with the agreed-upon 27 facts 20 by June 3, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. If Plaintiffs’ counsel is unwilling to sign a statement that includes the 21 27 agreed-upon facts by June 3, he is hereby ORDERED to show cause in a declaration filed by 22 June 3, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. as to why sanctions should not be imposed. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 30, 2013 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?