Heller v. Cepia L.L.C. et.al.

Filing 95

ORDER GRANTING 94 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 4/13/2012. Case Management Conference set for 4/20/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/9/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-01146-JSW Document94 Filed02/08/12 Page1 of 4 1 6 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP JEFFREY R. CHANIN, #103649 jchanin@kvn.com MATTHEW WERDEGAR, #200470 mwerdegar@kvn.com WARREN A. BRAUNIG, #243884 wbraunig@kvn.com 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: 415 391 5400 Facsimile: 415 397 7188 7 Attorneys for Defendant CEPIA, L.L.C. 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 JASON G. HELLER, an individual and sole proprietor doing business as Floating Lightbulb Toys, 13 Plaintiff, 14 Case No. CV11-01146 JSW (MEJ) STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER v. 15 16 17 18 19 Judge: CEPIA, L.L.C., a Missouri Limited Liability Company; A-TECH PRODUCT ENGINEERING COMPANY, LIMITED, a Hong Kong Limited Liability Company; THE BEAN PROJECT COMPANY LIMITED, a Hong Kong Limited Liability Company; YING LEUNG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, Hong Kong Limited Liability Company, Hon. Jeffrey S. White Date Comp. Filed: Trial Date: TBD March 10, 2011 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV11-01146 JSW (MEJ) 621806.01 Case3:11-cv-01146-JSW Document94 Filed02/08/12 Page2 of 4 1 Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 6-2 and Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Jason G. Heller, 2 Defendant Cepia L.L.C. (“Cepia”), Defendant A-Tech Product Engineering Company (“A- 3 Tech”) and Defendant The Bean Project Company Limited (“The Bean”), by and through 4 counsel, hereby stipulate and jointly request a continuance of the Case Management Conference 5 scheduled for February 24, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. 6 7 WHEREAS the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter is currently set for February 24, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. (Dkt. # 71); and 8 9 WHEREAS the parties understand that the Court requires lead counsel for each represented party to be present at the Initial Case Management Conference; and 10 WHEREAS lead counsel for Cepia, Jeffrey R. Chanin, is also lead counsel in a trial set to 11 begin on February 21, 2012, in United States v. McKesson Corp. et al., Case No. 2:08cv0214- 12 SA-JMV, in the Northern District of Mississippi (See Decl. of Jeffrey R. Chanin in Support of 13 Stipulation and Joint Request to Continue CMC, ¶¶ 2, 4); and 14 15 WHEREAS the U.S. v. McKesson trial is scheduled to last approximately four weeks, and Mr. Chanin will be in Mississippi for the entire duration of that period (Id. ¶ 4.); and 16 17 WHEREAS Mr. Chanin expects to be back in San Francisco during the week of March 26-30. (Id. ¶ 5); and 18 19 WHEREAS Mr. Chanin will then be taking a long-scheduled family trip to the Philippines from April 1 through April 17 (Id.); and 20 21 WHEREAS counsel for A-Tech and The Bean, Edwin Prather, is out of town and unavailable March 28-30, 2012 (Id. ¶ 7); 22 WHEREAS Cepia waited until now to seek a continuance due to the possibility that the 23 McKesson case might be won on summary judgment or otherwise reach a pre-trial resolution, but 24 it is now clear the case is going to trial. (Id. ¶ 3); and 25 26 WHEREAS the parties agree that the stipulated continuance should have minimal, if any, effect on the schedule for this case (Id. ¶ 8); and 27 28 621806.01 WHEREAS there have been seven previous modifications to the case schedule, with five 1 STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV11-01146 JSW (MEJ) Case3:11-cv-01146-JSW Document94 Filed02/08/12 Page3 of 4 1 of the seven initiated by the Court and the other two related to the dates for answering the 2 Complaint (Id. ¶¶ 9-16); and 3 WHEREAS all parties agree to the proposed continuance (Id. ¶¶ 6-7), 4 THEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the parties hereby stipulate and jointly request 5 that the initial case management conference currently scheduled for February 24, 2012 be 6 vacated and re-set for the first available date after April 17, 2012. 7 Cepia’s undersigned counsel Warren Braunig hereby attests that Robert Matz, counsel for 8 Plaintiff Jason G. Heller, and Edwin Prather, counsel for Defendants A-Tech and The Bean, 9 concur in the filing of this Stipulation and Request, in accordance with General Order 45, 10 Electronic Case Filing, section 10(b). 11 12 Dated: February 8, 2012 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 13 By: 14 15 Attorneys for Defendant CEPIA, L.L.C. 16 17 Dated: February 8, 2012 THE LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT C. MATZ LLP 18 19 By: 20 /s/ Robert C. Matz ROBERT C. MATZ Attorney for Plaintiff JASON G. HELLER 21 22 /s/ Warren A. Braunig JEFFREY R. CHANIN MATTHEW WERDEGAR WARREN A. BRAUNIG Dated: February 8, 2012 THE LAW OFFICE OF EDWIN K. PRATHER 23 24 25 26 27 28 621806.01 By: /s/ Edwin K. Prather EDWIN K. PRATHER Attorney for Defendants A-TECH PRODUCT ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED and THE BEAN PROJECT COMPANY LIMITED 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV11-01146 JSW (MEJ) Case3:11-cv-01146-JSW Document94 Filed02/08/12 Page4 of 4 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 3 4 Case Management Conference originally scheduled for Friday, February 24, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. April 20, 2012 1:30 shall be continued to ________________________________, at ____________ a.m. / p.m. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 9 Dated: February 8, 2012 8 9 10 ______________________________________ The Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 621806.01 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV11-01146 JSW (MEJ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?