Heller v. Cepia L.L.C. et.al.
Filing
95
ORDER GRANTING 94 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 4/13/2012. Case Management Conference set for 4/20/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/9/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2012)
Case3:11-cv-01146-JSW Document94 Filed02/08/12 Page1 of 4
1
6
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
JEFFREY R. CHANIN, #103649
jchanin@kvn.com
MATTHEW WERDEGAR, #200470
mwerdegar@kvn.com
WARREN A. BRAUNIG, #243884
wbraunig@kvn.com
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
415 391 5400
Facsimile:
415 397 7188
7
Attorneys for Defendant CEPIA, L.L.C.
2
3
4
5
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
JASON G. HELLER, an individual and sole
proprietor doing business as Floating
Lightbulb Toys,
13
Plaintiff,
14
Case No. CV11-01146 JSW (MEJ)
STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST
TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
v.
15
16
17
18
19
Judge:
CEPIA, L.L.C., a Missouri Limited Liability
Company; A-TECH PRODUCT
ENGINEERING COMPANY, LIMITED, a
Hong Kong Limited Liability Company; THE
BEAN PROJECT COMPANY LIMITED, a
Hong Kong Limited Liability Company;
YING LEUNG INTERNATIONAL
LIMITED, Hong Kong Limited Liability
Company,
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
Date Comp. Filed:
Trial Date:
TBD
March 10, 2011
20
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. CV11-01146 JSW (MEJ)
621806.01
Case3:11-cv-01146-JSW Document94 Filed02/08/12 Page2 of 4
1
Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 6-2 and Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Jason G. Heller,
2
Defendant Cepia L.L.C. (“Cepia”), Defendant A-Tech Product Engineering Company (“A-
3
Tech”) and Defendant The Bean Project Company Limited (“The Bean”), by and through
4
counsel, hereby stipulate and jointly request a continuance of the Case Management Conference
5
scheduled for February 24, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.
6
7
WHEREAS the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter is currently set for
February 24, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. (Dkt. # 71); and
8
9
WHEREAS the parties understand that the Court requires lead counsel for each
represented party to be present at the Initial Case Management Conference; and
10
WHEREAS lead counsel for Cepia, Jeffrey R. Chanin, is also lead counsel in a trial set to
11
begin on February 21, 2012, in United States v. McKesson Corp. et al., Case No. 2:08cv0214-
12
SA-JMV, in the Northern District of Mississippi (See Decl. of Jeffrey R. Chanin in Support of
13
Stipulation and Joint Request to Continue CMC, ¶¶ 2, 4); and
14
15
WHEREAS the U.S. v. McKesson trial is scheduled to last approximately four weeks, and
Mr. Chanin will be in Mississippi for the entire duration of that period (Id. ¶ 4.); and
16
17
WHEREAS Mr. Chanin expects to be back in San Francisco during the week of
March 26-30. (Id. ¶ 5); and
18
19
WHEREAS Mr. Chanin will then be taking a long-scheduled family trip to the
Philippines from April 1 through April 17 (Id.); and
20
21
WHEREAS counsel for A-Tech and The Bean, Edwin Prather, is out of town and
unavailable March 28-30, 2012 (Id. ¶ 7);
22
WHEREAS Cepia waited until now to seek a continuance due to the possibility that the
23
McKesson case might be won on summary judgment or otherwise reach a pre-trial resolution, but
24
it is now clear the case is going to trial. (Id. ¶ 3); and
25
26
WHEREAS the parties agree that the stipulated continuance should have minimal, if any,
effect on the schedule for this case (Id. ¶ 8); and
27
28
621806.01
WHEREAS there have been seven previous modifications to the case schedule, with five
1
STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. CV11-01146 JSW (MEJ)
Case3:11-cv-01146-JSW Document94 Filed02/08/12 Page3 of 4
1
of the seven initiated by the Court and the other two related to the dates for answering the
2
Complaint (Id. ¶¶ 9-16); and
3
WHEREAS all parties agree to the proposed continuance (Id. ¶¶ 6-7),
4
THEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the parties hereby stipulate and jointly request
5
that the initial case management conference currently scheduled for February 24, 2012 be
6
vacated and re-set for the first available date after April 17, 2012.
7
Cepia’s undersigned counsel Warren Braunig hereby attests that Robert Matz, counsel for
8
Plaintiff Jason G. Heller, and Edwin Prather, counsel for Defendants A-Tech and The Bean,
9
concur in the filing of this Stipulation and Request, in accordance with General Order 45,
10
Electronic Case Filing, section 10(b).
11
12
Dated: February 8, 2012
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
13
By:
14
15
Attorneys for Defendant CEPIA, L.L.C.
16
17
Dated: February 8, 2012
THE LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT C.
MATZ LLP
18
19
By:
20
/s/ Robert C. Matz
ROBERT C. MATZ
Attorney for Plaintiff JASON G. HELLER
21
22
/s/ Warren A. Braunig
JEFFREY R. CHANIN
MATTHEW WERDEGAR
WARREN A. BRAUNIG
Dated: February 8, 2012
THE LAW OFFICE OF EDWIN K.
PRATHER
23
24
25
26
27
28
621806.01
By:
/s/ Edwin K. Prather
EDWIN K. PRATHER
Attorney for Defendants A-TECH
PRODUCT ENGINEERING COMPANY
LIMITED and THE BEAN PROJECT
COMPANY LIMITED
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. CV11-01146 JSW (MEJ)
Case3:11-cv-01146-JSW Document94 Filed02/08/12 Page4 of 4
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
3
4
Case Management Conference originally scheduled for Friday, February 24, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.
April 20, 2012
1:30
shall be continued to ________________________________, at ____________ a.m. / p.m.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
9
Dated: February 8, 2012
8
9
10
______________________________________
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
621806.01
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. CV11-01146 JSW (MEJ)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?