J&J Sports Productions, Inc v. Nguyen et al
Filing
59
ORDER, Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/30/12 is continued to 1/11/2013 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 11/27/12. Motions terminated: 58 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER For an Order Continuing Case Management Conference filed by J&J Sports Productions, Inc.(tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012)
1
2
3
4
Kenneth N. Frucht, Esq.
Frederick J. Geonetta, Esq.
GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP
100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Telephone: (415) 433.4589
Facsimile: (415) 392.7973
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DAVID REY
Steven R. Blackburn, State Bar No. 154797
Matthew A. Goodin, State Bar No. 169674
Lauren M. Cooper, State Bar No. 254580
EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
One California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-5427
Telephone: 415.398.3500
Facsimile: 415.398.0955
sblackburn@ebglaw.com
mgoodin@ebglaw.com
bbrown@ebglaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants,
C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC. and
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
DAVID REY,
20
21
22
23
CASE NO. CV 10-01970 SI
Plaintiff,
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE PRE-TRIAL
CONFERENCE
C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC., a Delaware
Corporation, AMERICAN SUGAR
REFINING, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
and DOES 1-100, inclusive,
24
Defendant.
25
26
27
The parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
28
WHEREAS; at the hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on October 5,
6653779v1
Stipulation and Proposed Order Re: Pretrial Conference
CV 10-01970 SI
1
2012, the Court continued the trial date in this matter to January 22, 2013, the same date as the
2
trial date currently set in the matter of Leatherbury v. C&H Sugar, et al., C-10-01969 SI, and
3
informed the parties that they should choose which of the two cases would go to trial on January
4
22, 2013;
WHEREAS; the parties have jointly agreed that the Rey matter should proceed to trial
5
6
on January 22, 2012;
WHEREAS; the parties are awaiting a ruling on Defendants’ summary judgment motion
7
8
in this matter, and wish as much as possible to avoid unnecessary trial preparation in the event
9
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted;
WHEREAS; the parties do not at this time wish to continue the trial date of January 22,
10
11
2013;
THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND REQUEST a continuance of the Pretrial
12
13
Conference and related dates as follows:
14
Joint Pretrial Conference Statement due: December 18, 2012;
15
Pretrial Conference date: January 1, 2013;
16
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
-26653779v1
Stipulation and Proposed Order Re: Pretrial Conference
Case No. CV 10-01970 SI
1
DATED: November 26, 2012
2
GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP
By: /s/ Kenneth N. Frucht
Kenneth N. Frucht, Esq.
Frederick J. Geonetta, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DAVID REY
3
4
5
6
DATED: November 26, 2012
By: /s/ Matthew A. Goodin
Steven R. Blackburn
Matthew A. Goodin
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendants,
C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC. and
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC.
10
11
12
EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pre-trial dates are continued as follows:
13
Joint Pretrial Conference Statement due: December 18, 2012;
13 at 3:30 p.,m.
Pretrial Conference date: January 1, 2013;
14
15
16
17
18
19
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11/27/12
Date: _______________
________________________________________
JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-36653779v1
Stipulation and Proposed Order Re: Pretrial Conference
Case No. CV 10-01970 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?