Hensley-Maclean et al v. Safeway, Inc.

Filing 197

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 196 RESETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS. Motion Hearing previously set for 9/3/2015 Continued to 9/10/2015 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/27/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Stephen Gardner (pro hac vice)
STANLEY LAW GROUP
6116 N. Central Expy., Ste. 1500
Dallas, Texas 75206
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Martha Smith and Eleanor Tate
Monty Agarwal
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Safeway Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
MARTHA SMITH and ELEANOR )
TATE on behalf of themselves and )
)
all others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAFEWAY INC.,
)
Defendant.
)
)
)

Case No. 3:11-cv-01230-RS
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED)
ORDER RESETTING HEARING ON
MOTION TO DISMISS
Date: September 3, 2015
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Place: Courtroom 3, 17th Floor
Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties respectfully submit this Stipulation and
Proposed Order resetting the briefing deadlines and hearing date on Defendant Safeway
Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 195, “Safeway Motion”).
The current briefing schedule conflicts with vacations of two of Plaintiffs’ counsel. If
the Court agrees with the proposed schedule, the parties also propose to reset the hearing
by one week, to allow the Court time to review the completed briefing prior to the hearing.
The Court should be aware that the new proposed schedule provides Defendant’s counsel

1

an additional few days to reply, as compared to the regular briefing schedule, to

2

accommodate one of Defendant’s counsel’s vacation plans in light of Plaintiff’s request to

3

continue the schedule. The parties therefor propose the following schedule.

4

Safeway Motion

5

1.

Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Safeway Motion is due by August 17, 2015.

6

2.

Safeway’s reply in support of its Motion is due by August 28, 2015.

7

3.

Hearing on the Safeway Motion set for September 10, 2015, subject to the
Court’s availability.

8
9

Respectfully submitted,

10
11

STANLEY LAW GROUP

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP

By: /s/ Stephen Gardner
Stephen Gardner
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Martha Smith and Eleanor Tate

By: /s/ Monty Agarwal
Monty Agarwal
Attorneys for Defendant
Safeway, Inc.

12
13
14
15
16
17

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

Hearing on the Safeway Motion will be held at 1:30 p.m. on September 10

, 2015.

19
20
21
22

Dated:

7/27/15
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-