Garcia v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP et al
Filing
46
ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/20/2011. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DONNA GARCIA,
9
Plaintiff,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
No. C-11-1253 EMC
v.
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LP, et
al.,
12
13
Defendants.
___________________________________/
14
15
16
On October 20, 2011, the Court convened the parties by telephone to discuss discovery
17
disputes raised by Plaintiff's letter to the Court. Docket No. 42. As noted during the conference
18
call, the Court denies Defendant Brachfeld's request to stay discovery pending any forthcoming
19
dispositive motions. The Court orders that the noticed depositions of the Brachfeld 30(b)(6) witness
20
and of Betty Gonzales shall go forward as scheduled. However, the Court grants Defendant
21
Brachfeld's motion for a protective order as to the deposition of Erica Brachfeld absent further
22
showing of necessity from Plaintiff after the two depositions noted above have taken place.
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
The parties also raised a point of confusion from this Court's October 7, 2001 Minute Entry.
2
Docket No. 39. The Court had stated: "Court ordered deposition notice, which includes notice to
3
produce documents, to be reduced to 20 days." To clarify, the Court orders that notices to produce
4
documents appended to deposition notices shall be reduced from 30 days to 20 days.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
Dated: October 20, 2011
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?