Garcia v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP et al

Filing 99

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/10/2012. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

DONNA GARCIA,

9

Plaintiff,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

No. C-11-1253 EMC

v.

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE

RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LP, et
al.,

12
13

Defendants.
___________________________________/

14
15

On April 4, 2012, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why Defendant's counsel should

16

not be sanctioned for making factual contentions without evidentiary support as required by Rule

17

11(b). Docket No. 97. Counsel has now provided the Court with a satisfactory Rule 11 basis for his

18

contention that “Brachfeld was hired to collect the consumer credit account opened by Plaintiff and

19

which she used to purchase the freezer, but never paid for it,” Birdt Decl. ¶ 7, and his related

20

contentions at oral argument that Brachfeld’s debt collection efforts stemmed from the freezer

21

purchase. Docket No. 98. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISCHARGES the Order to Show

22

Cause.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: April 10, 2012
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2