Oliver et al v. SD-3 LLC et al
Filing
75
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 74 STIPULATION To Set Motion to Dismiss Briefing Schedule and Page Limits and to Stay Discovery. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/13/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2012)
Case3:11-cv-01260-JSW Document74 Filed02/02/12 Page1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ALDO A. BADINI (SBN 257086)
abadini@dl.com
DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 3500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 951-1120
Facsimile: (212) 632-0888
JEFFREY L. KESSLER (admitted pro hac vice)
jkessler@dl.com
DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP
1301 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: (212) 259-8000
Facsimile: (212) 259-6333
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendants
PANASONIC CORPORATION
PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA
[Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page]
12
13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
)
DR. DAN OLIVER, JEANNIE OLIVER, JOE )
SOLO, BERNARD GROSS, SUSAN KEELIN, )
WALTER KVASNIK, KOU
)
SRIMOUNGHANCH, HUMBERTO
)
GONZALEZ, SAMUEL D. LEGGETT, BRIAN )
ALBEE, MARY LOUISE FOWLER, JOE
)
SHAW, and RHONDA SCHULTZ, on their
)
own behalves and on behalf of all others
)
similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
SD-3C, LLC; PANASONIC CORP.;
)
PANASONIC CORP. OF NORTH AMERICA; )
TOSHIBA CORP.; TOSHIBA AMERICA
)
ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; and
)
SANDISK CORP.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
No. CV-11-1260 JSW
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET
MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS AND
TO STAY DISCOVERY
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
C ASE NO.: CV-11-1260 JSW
Case3:11-cv-01260-JSW Document74 Filed02/02/12 Page2 of 5
1
WHEREAS on June 27, 2011, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and
2
defendants Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Toshiba Corporation,
3
Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., SD-3C, LLC, and SanDisk Corporation
4
(collectively, “Defendants”) filed a Joint Stipulation to Extend Time Within Which to Respond to
5
Complaint Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), which provided that Defendants’ time to respond to an
6
amended complaint filed by Plaintiffs would be extended to include the ninetieth (90th) day after
7
the filing date of such an amended complaint;
8
WHEREAS on November 23, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint;
9
WHEREAS, pursuant to the June 27, 2011 stipulation among the parties, the time for
10
Defendants to respond to the First Amended Complaint was extended to February 21, 2012, which
11
is the ninetieth day after the Plaintiffs filed the First Amended Complaint;
12
13
14
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES
HERETO, through their respective counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that:
(1.)
Defendants may file a single joint motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ First Amended
15
Complaint and a consolidated memorandum of points and authorities in support of their joint
16
motion; Plaintiffs may file a single opposition to Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss; and
17
Defendants may file a single consolidated reply to Plaintiffs’ opposition.
18
(2.)
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), the time for Plaintiffs to file their opposition to
19
Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss shall be extended to and include the forty-fifth (45th) day after
20
the date on which Defendants file their joint motion to dismiss.
21
(3.)
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), the time for Defendants to file their consolidated
22
reply to Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss shall be extended to and
23
24
include the twenty-fifth (25th) day after the date on which Plaintiffs file their opposition.
forty (40)
(4.)
Defendants shall have a page limit of fifty (50) pages for their consolidated brief in
25
support of their joint motion to dismiss (notwithstanding that the six defendants would be entitled
26
to an aggregate of ninety pages, or fifteen pages each, pursuant to the Court’s Civil Standing
forty (40)
Orders); Plaintiffs shall have a page limit of fifty (50) pages for their brief in opposition; and
twenty-five (25)
Defendants shall have a page limit of thirty (30) pages for their consolidated brief in reply.
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
C ASE NO.: CV-11-1260 JSW
Case3:11-cv-01260-JSW Document74 Filed02/02/12 Page3 of 5
1
(5.)
The stay of discovery in this case, which has been in effect pursuant to a stipulation
2
among the parties that was So Ordered by the Court on June 28, 2011, shall be extended pursuant to
3
Local Rule 6-2(a), and all discovery in this action shall be stayed through the ninetieth (90th) day
4
after the Court enters an Order resolving the Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First
5
Amended Complaint, unless Plaintiffs file a Second Amended Complaint, in which case discovery
6
shall be stayed until the Court enters an Order resolving the Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss
7
Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint.
8
(6.)
No party shall serve requests for discovery until the stay has expired.
9
(7.)
The parties shall not be required to serve initial disclosures, pursuant to Federal Rule
10
of Civil Procedure 26(a), until the stay of discovery has expired.
11
(8.)
This Stipulation is made without prejudice to any party’s right to move to extend the
12
stay of discovery.
13
(9.)
The parties agree and stipulate that they will confer and propose to the Court a date
14
for the Case Management Conference and associated discovery and ADR obligations after the stay
15
requested herein expires.
16
(10.)
This Stipulation applies to this proceeding only.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
C ASE NO.: CV-11-1260 JSW
2
Case3:11-cv-01260-JSW Document74 Filed02/02/12 Page4 of 5
1
Dated: February 2, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
2
By: s/Max L. Tribble
Max L. Tribble*
Joseph S. Grinstein*
Eric J. Mayer*
Susman Godfrey LLP
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100
Houston, TX 77002-5096
Telephone: (713) 651-9366
Facsimile: (713) 654-6666
*admitted pro hac vice
By: s/Aldo A. Badini
Aldo A. Badini (SBN 257086)
Ian L. Papendick (SBN 275648)
Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street
Suite 3500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 951-1120
Facsimile: (212) 632-0888
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Jeffrey L. Kessler*
James F. Lerner*
Susannah P. Torpey*
Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP
1301 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019
Telephone: (212) 259-8000
Facsimile: (212) 259-6333
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
David S. Turetsky*
Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP
1101 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 346-8000
Facsimile: (202) 346-8102
*admitted pro hac vice
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Defendants Panasonic Corporation and
Panasonic Corporation of North America
17
By: s/Christopher B. Hockett
Christopher B. Hockett (SBN 121539)
Neal A. Potischman (SBN 254862)
Samantha H. Knox (SBN 254427)
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: (650) 752-2000
Facsimile: (650) 752-2111
18
19
20
21
22
Attorneys for Defendant
SD-3C, LLC
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
C ASE NO.: CV-11-1260 JSW
3
Case3:11-cv-01260-JSW Document74 Filed02/02/12 Page5 of 5
By: s/Daniel M. Wall
Daniel M. Wall (SBN 102580)
Belinda S. Lee (SBN 199635)
Sarah M. Ray (SBN 229670)
Latham & Watkins LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: (415) 391-0600
Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
1
2
3
4
5
Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation and
Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
6
7
By: s/Frank M. Hinman
Frank M. Hinman (SBN 157402)
Sujal J. Shah (SBN 215230)
Rianne E. Rocca (SBN 221640)
Bingham McCutchen LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: (415) 393-2462
Facsimile: (415) 393-2286
8
9
10
11
12
Richard S. Taffet*
Bingham McCutchen LLP
399 Park Avenue,
New York, NY 10022-4689
Telephone: (212) 705-7729
Facsimile: (212) 702-3603
*admitted pro hac vice
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant
SanDisk Corporation
17
18
19
Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § X.B., the filer attests that concurrence
in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above signatories.
20
21
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
February 13
Dated: _______________, 2012
________________________
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
United States District Court Judge
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
C ASE NO.: CV-11-1260 JSW
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?