Akaosugi et al v. Benihana, Inc.

Filing 223

ORDER re 221 Letter filed by Tetsuo Akaosugi, Rinko Donahue, Hieu Nguyen, 222 Brief, filed by Benihana National Corp. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 TETSUO AKAOSUGI, HIEU NGUYEN, and RINKO DONAHUE, No. C 11-01272 WHA Plaintiffs, v. ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S BRIEF DESCRIBING PREJUDICE DUE TO PLAINTIFFS’ LATE DISCLOSURE OF DAMAGES COMPUTATION; ALLEN LETTER BENIHANA, INC., dba BENIHANA NATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant. / 16 17 With regard to defendant’s supplemental memorandum describing prejudice by reason of 18 plaintiffs’ late disclosure of damages computations, this order will allow plaintiffs’ late 19 disclosures. In the Court’s judgment, the prejudice is minimal in light of the fact that ALL 20 21 22 THREE PLAINTIFFS MUST STAND FOR A DEPOSITION PRIOR TO TRIAL. The alleged prejudice set forth in defendant’s memorandum is unpersuasive. With regard to the October 3 letter from Mr. Allen, counsel for plaintiffs, concerning two 23 witnesses who will be on vacation until October 14, plaintiffs’ counsel have no one other than 24 themselves to blame for their circumstances. If those witnesses are so important, counsel should 25 have subpoenaed them long ago and should not have waited until a week before trial. Had they 26 been subpoenaed, the witnesses would have been available for trial. As they have not been 27 subpoenaed, the witnesses were free to leave and go away. The trial date has been set since June 28 2011, and no excuse has been given for counsel’s failure to timely subpoena these witnesses. The trial will not be delayed. 1 It is highly likely that phase one of the trial will be completed prior to October 15. In the 2 unlikely event that trial takes longer than the judge anticipates, then this matter may be raised 3 again. In the future, all counsel are reminded that they should file proper motions and not send 4 letters to the Court. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: October 3, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?