Westland Giftware Inc. v. Product Design Corporation et al

Filing 64

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/25/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Westland Giftware Inc., 6 7 8 Plaintiff, ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS v. Product Design Corporation, 9 Defendant. 10 / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court No. CV11-01307 JSW 12 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 13 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 14 ORDERED that: 15 A. DATES 16 Jury Trial Date: 1/7/2013, at 8:00 a.m., 8 day estimate 17 Pretrial Conference: Monday, 12/3/2012, at 2:00 p.m. 18 Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 10/12/2012, 9:00 a.m. 19 Last Day for Expert Discovery: 8/31/2012 20 Close of Non-expert Discovery: 5/31/2012 21 Further Case Management Conference: 6/22/2012, 1:30 p.m. 22 Supplemental Case Management Statement due: 6/15/2012 23 B. DISCOVERY 24 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 25 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 26 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of 27 non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 28 supplementation has been completed. 1 C. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 2 This matter is referred for assignment to a Magistrate Judge to conduct a settlement 3 conference to be completed by January 31, 2012. The parties will be contacted by that judge's 4 chambers with a date and time for the conference. No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its 7 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) 8 without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline 9 contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties 10 may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the 11 For the Northern District of California D. 6 United States District Court 5 date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to 12 a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule 13 that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are 14 specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain 15 leave of Court. 16 PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: October 25, 2011 18 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 WESTLAND GIFTWARE, Case Number: CV11-01307 JSW 6 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 v. 8 PRODUCT DESIGN CORP et al, 9 Defendant. / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 12 District Court, Northern District of California. 13 That on October 25, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter 14 listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 15 16 17 James Bradshaw 18 2161 Thornecroft Lane Roseville, CA 95747 19 20 Dated: October 25, 2011 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?