Ubaldi v. SLM Corporation

Filing 106

ORDER REGARDING DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 11. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 10/3/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

TINA M UBALDI,

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

11
12

ORDER REGARDING DOCUMENT
REQUEST NO. 11

Plaintiff,

9
10

No. C -11-01320-EDL)

v.
SLM CORPORATION,
Defendant.

/

13
14

During the September 25, 2012 hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, the Court ordered

15

the parties to meet and confer regarding a time period to govern Plaintiff’s eleventh document

16

request. The parties met and conferred and were unable to reach agreement, and instead submitted

17

a joint letter explaining their differences of opinion on October 2, 2012. Having considered the joint

18

letter, the Court believes that the time period from January 1, 2000 through December 1, 2005 is the

19

relevant time period for this document request. If documents produced by Defendant within that

20

timeframe indicate that there is other relevant information outside that timeframe, Plaintiff may

21

come back to the Court and request an expanded timeframe at that time, provided that the request

22

meets the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(2)(C)(iii).

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: October 3, 2012
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge