Wolf v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
60
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING Show Cause Response due by 11/4/2011.. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 31, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JULIE ANN WOLF,
No. C 11-01337 WHA
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., also known as
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, A division of Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., formerly known as Wachovia
Mortgage, FSB, and formerly known as World
Savings Bank, FSB, formerly known as World
Savings Bank, FSB, NDEX WEST LLC, GOLDEN
SAVINGS ASSOCIATION SERVICE
COMPANY, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
GUARANTEE MORTGAGE, and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND
VACATING HEARING
Defendants.
/
20
21
On October 12, 2011, an order issued granting in part and denying in part defendants’
22
motion to dismiss and strike (Dkt. No. 52). Plaintiff was given fourteen calendar days from the
23
date of the order to file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Thus, the motion was
24
due October 26.
25
Plaintiff gave notice of motion and filed a motion for leave to amend plaintiff’s first
26
amended complaint on October 28, two days after the deadline set by the Court for filing this
27
motion. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the motion for leave to file an
28
amended complaint should not be stricken. Plaintiff must show cause by NOON ON NOVEMBER 4,
1
2011. The motion hearing set for December 8, is VACATED. A new briefing schedule and motion
2
hearing will be set if good cause is shown.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: October 31, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?