Rojas v. Sonoma County et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BY 3/19/12 AND RESETTING FURTHER CMC TO 3/30/12 re 29 Stipulation filed by Artemis Herrera Rojas. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/12/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 John L. Burris, Esq., SBN 69888 Benjamin Nisenbaum, ESQ. SBN 222173 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 John.burris@johnburrislaw.com Bnisenbaum@hotmail.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 11-cv-01358 EMC (DMR) ARTERMIS HERRERA ROJAS, STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE ADR ORDER Plaintiff, vs. SONOMA COUNTY, a municipal corporation; DEPUTY SHERIFF CLARK (first name unknown), individually; DOES 1-100, inclusive; individually, Defendants. 18 19 20 STIPULATION 21 22 23 24 1. WHEREAS, the Court ordered the parties to complete ADR before the upcoming Further Case Management Conference on January 20, 2012; 2. WHEREAS, a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu 25 was set for January 13, 2012, and the parties have timely submitted their Settlement Conference 26 documents for the January 13, 2012 Settlement Conference; 27 28 3. WHEREAS, Plaintiff was prepared to appear at the January 13, 2012 Settlement Conference; 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. WHEREAS, Plaintiff was arrested on unrelated bench warrants on January 9, 2012 in Sonoma County; 5. WHEREAS, Plaintiff is unable to make bail on said bench warrants, and will be unable to appear at the January 13, 2012 Settlement Conference; 6. WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel has contacted Magistrate Judge Ryu’s chambers, notifying Magistrate Judge Ryu’s courtroom clerk of Plaintiff’s involuntary unavailability; 7. The parties respectfully request that the Court grant an additional 60 days to 8 complete ADR, allowing the Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Ryu to be 9 continued to a date Plaintiff will be able to attend the Settlement Conference; 10 8. The parties also respectfully request that the Further Case Management 11 Conference currently set for January 20, 2012, be continued an additional 60 days, to allow the 12 parties to complete ADR by the time of the Further Case Management Conference. 13 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 17 18 Dated: January 10, 2012 /s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum Benjamin Nisenbaum Attorney for Plaintiff 19 20 21 BRUCE D. GOLDSTEIN, County Counsel 22 23 24 25 26 Dated: January 10, 2012 /s/ Joshua A. Meyers Joshua A. Myers Attorney for Defendants 27 28 2 1 ORDER 2 4 PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, the parties are granted an additional (by 3/19/12) 60 days to complete ADR. The Settlement Conference shall be completed by March 20, 2012. 5 3/30 The Further Case Management Conference is hereby continued to _________________, 2012 at 6 10:30 a.m. 7 8 15 S R NIA FO ER H 14 RT 13 HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE en d M. Ch e Edwar Judg NO 12 Dated: DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI ______________________________ AS MO LI 11 1/12/12 UNIT ED 10 RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 3 N D IS T IC T R OF C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?