Rojas v. Sonoma County et al
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BY 3/19/12 AND RESETTING FURTHER CMC TO 3/30/12 re 29 Stipulation filed by Artemis Herrera Rojas. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/12/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
John L. Burris, Esq., SBN 69888
Benjamin Nisenbaum, ESQ. SBN 222173
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
John.burris@johnburrislaw.com
Bnisenbaum@hotmail.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. 11-cv-01358 EMC (DMR)
ARTERMIS HERRERA ROJAS,
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINE TO COMPLETE ADR
ORDER
Plaintiff,
vs.
SONOMA COUNTY, a municipal corporation;
DEPUTY SHERIFF CLARK (first name
unknown), individually; DOES 1-100, inclusive;
individually,
Defendants.
18
19
20
STIPULATION
21
22
23
24
1.
WHEREAS, the Court ordered the parties to complete ADR before the upcoming
Further Case Management Conference on January 20, 2012;
2.
WHEREAS, a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu
25
was set for January 13, 2012, and the parties have timely submitted their Settlement Conference
26
documents for the January 13, 2012 Settlement Conference;
27
28
3.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff was prepared to appear at the January 13, 2012 Settlement
Conference;
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
4.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff was arrested on unrelated bench warrants on January 9,
2012 in Sonoma County;
5.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff is unable to make bail on said bench warrants, and will be
unable to appear at the January 13, 2012 Settlement Conference;
6.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel has contacted Magistrate Judge Ryu’s chambers,
notifying Magistrate Judge Ryu’s courtroom clerk of Plaintiff’s involuntary unavailability;
7.
The parties respectfully request that the Court grant an additional 60 days to
8
complete ADR, allowing the Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Ryu to be
9
continued to a date Plaintiff will be able to attend the Settlement Conference;
10
8.
The parties also respectfully request that the Further Case Management
11
Conference currently set for January 20, 2012, be continued an additional 60 days, to allow the
12
parties to complete ADR by the time of the Further Case Management Conference.
13
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
17
18
Dated: January 10, 2012
/s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum
Benjamin Nisenbaum
Attorney for Plaintiff
19
20
21
BRUCE D. GOLDSTEIN,
County Counsel
22
23
24
25
26
Dated: January 10, 2012
/s/ Joshua A. Meyers
Joshua A. Myers
Attorney for Defendants
27
28
2
1
ORDER
2
4
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, the parties are granted an additional
(by 3/19/12)
60 days to complete ADR. The Settlement Conference shall be completed by March 20, 2012.
5
3/30
The Further Case Management Conference is hereby continued to _________________, 2012 at
6
10:30 a.m.
7
8
15
S
R NIA
FO
ER
H
14
RT
13
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg
NO
12
Dated:
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
______________________________
AS MO
LI
11
1/12/12
UNIT
ED
10
RT
U
O
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
3
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?