Gonda v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc et al

Filing 19

ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 9/9/2011. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 THOMAS A. GONDA, JR., Plaintiff, 8 10 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 v. 11 THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, et al., 12 Defendants. ) Case No. 11-01363 SC ) ) ORDER STAYING CASE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 13 14 Thomas A. Gonda, Jr. ("Plaintiff") brings this action for 15 equitable relief and benefits under the Employee Retirement Income 16 Security Act ("ERISA"). 17 alleges that The Permanente Medical Group, et al. ("Defendants") 18 breached their obligations under ERISA and an employee welfare 19 benefit plan by failing to conduct a proper review prior to 20 terminating Plaintiffs' benefits under the plan. 21 Plaintiff has also initiated an arbitration proceeding against 22 Defendants regarding Defendants' decision that Plaintiff is 23 precluded from returning to employment as a cardiothoracic surgeon. 24 ECF No. 15 ("JCMS") at 8. 25 the Court stay this action pending further developments in the 26 arbitration proceeding. 27 objection to this request. 28 ECF No. 1 ("Compl.") ¶ 1. Plaintiff Id. ¶ 10. On August 8, 2011, Plaintiff asked that ECF No. 18. Defendants have not filed an In the interest of judicial economy, 1 th Court STAYS th he his actio on. With hin ten ( (10) days of fina s al 2 resolution of the pending arbitrat n tion proc ceeding, Plaintif shall ff 3 no otify the Court o the ou e of utcome an file a request for the Court t nd t e to 4 lift its stay. s 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDE S ERED. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 Dated Septem d: mber 9, 2 2011 UNITED ST U TATES DIS STRICT JU UDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?