Yates v. Home Plate Cafe et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Deadline for the Parties to Conduct the Joint Site Inspection. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/19/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011)

Download PDF
1 4 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414) THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 4328 Redwood Hwy., Suite 300 San Rafael, CA 94903 Telephone: 415/674-8600 Facsimile: 415/674-9900 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES 2 3 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) HOME PLATE CAFÉ; NICHOLAS W. JOHNSON and TERRI PIPER-JOHNSON, ) ) CO-TRUSTEES of the NICK JOHNSON ) ) and TERRI PIPER-JOHNSON, 2005 ) TRUST, UAD OCTOBER 17, 2005; ) REBECCA FISHER STORY and ) WALLACE L. AMUNDSON, TRUSTEES ) ) of the REBECCA C. FISHER TRUST dated ) ) OCTOBER 17, 2005; MATTHEW ) HOWELL; JAMES AGAPOFF JR.; MARY ) PEGEEN CARDOZA, an individual dba ) HOME PLATE CAFÉ and OLIVER DYER- ) ) BENNETT, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) CRAIG YATES, an individual, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 CASE NO. CV-11-1371-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO CONDUCT THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE DEADLINE FOR THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION 1 1 Plaintiff CRAIG YATES, an individual and Defendants NICHOLAS W. JOHNSON and 2 TERRI PIPER-JOHNSON, CO-TRUSTEES of the NICK JOHNSON and TERRI PIPER- 3 JOHNSON, 2005 TRUST, UAD OCTOBER 17, 2005; REBECCA FISHER STORY and 4 WALLACE L. AMUNDSON, TRUSTEES of the REBECCA C. FISHER TRUST dated 5 OCTOBER 17, 2005; MARY PEGEEN CARDOZA, an individual dba HOME PLATE CAFÉ; 6 and OLIVER DYER-BENNETT, by and through the parties respective counsel in the above- 7 mentioned case respectfully request and hereby make the following stipulation: 1. 8 9 WHEREAS, plaintiff CRAIG YATES attempted and requested the General Order 56 joint site inspection as ordered by the court to be conducted on October 5, 2011; and 2. 10 WHEREAS, prior to the reassignment of this case, plaintiff’s counsel Thomas E. 11 Frankovich committed to moving a portion of his office and his primary residence to Mazatlan, 12 Mexico and will be out of the country October 17, 2011 through November 2, 2011 and 13 December 19, 2011 through January 2, 2012; and 3. 14 15 the parties were unable to conduct the joint site inspection; and 4. 16 17 WHEREAS, due to scheduling conflicts and the above-mentioned circumstances, WHEREAS, the parties are currently scheduled to conduct the joint site inspection of the subject premises on Wednesday, December 7, 2011; and 5. 18 WHEREAS, the parties, hereto agree, stipulate and respectfully request that the 19 last day for the parties and counsel to conduct the joint inspection of the premises be continued 20 up to and including December 15, 2011. 21 IT IS STIPULATED. 22 23 Dated: October 17, 2011 24 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION By: /s/Thomas E. Frankovich Thomas E. Frankovich Attorney for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES 25 26 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE DEADLINE FOR THE JOINT SITE INSPECTION 2 Chen A H LI RT ER R NIA NO ard M. dw Judge E FO S UNIT ED RT U O October 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?