OneWest Bank, FSB v. Perez et al

Filing 18

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME ON MOTION TO REMAND by Hon. William Alsup denying 17 Ex Parte Application.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/14/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 ONEWEST BANK, FSB, as purchaser of certain assets of First Federal Bank of California from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Acting as Receiver, 15 16 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME ON MOTION TO REMAND Plaintiff, 13 14 No. C 11-01376 WHA v. TONY PEREZ and MARIA PEREZ, Defendants. / 17 18 Plaintiff is moving to remand. Plaintiff noticed a hearing for July 21, but concurrently 19 filed an ex parte application to shorten time on the motion to remand. That application is 20 DENIED. Defendants are pro se and they already have a deadline for filing their opposition brief 21 of June 24, pursuant to the local rules. The motion will be decided promptly enough. 22 23 On the other hand, this order serves as further notice to defendants that they must respond by the deadline of June 24 to the motion to remand. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: June 13, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?