Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. The California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan
Filing
30
ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. Defendant and counter-claimant California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan's Motion to Compel, filed December 30, 2011, and all further discovery matter s, are referred to a Magistrate Judge to be heard and considered at the convenience of the assigned Magistrate Judge's calendar. The February 3, 2012 hearing is vacated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 9, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
13
14
15
ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
COMPEL PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS
Plaintiff,
11
12
No. C 11-1419 MMC
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Massachusetts Corporation,
v.
THE CALIFORNIA AUTOMOBILE
ASSIGNED RISK PLAN, a program
established under California Insurance Code
section 11620 et seq., and DOES 1 through
20,
Defendants.
16
/
17
18
THE CALIFORNIA AUTOMOBILE
ASSIGNED RISK PLAN,
19
20
21
22
23
Counter-Claimant,
v.
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Massachusetts Corporation,
Counter-Defendant
/
24
25
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1, defendant and counter-claimant California
26
Automobile Assigned Risk Plan’s Motion to Compel, filed December 30, 2011, and all
27
further discovery matters, are hereby REFERRED to a Magistrate Judge to be heard and
28
considered at the convenience of the assigned Magistrate Judge’s calendar.
1
2
3
4
Counsel will be advised of the date, time and place of the next appearance by notice
from the assigned Magistrate Judge’s chambers.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 9, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The February 3, 2012 hearing before the undersigned is vacated.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?