Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. The California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan

Filing 62

ORDER VACATING AUGUST 10, 2012 HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for decision thereon, and vacates the hearing scheduled for August 10, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 7, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 13 14 15 ORDER VACATING AUGUST 10, 2012 HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, 11 12 No. C 11-1419 MMC LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts Corporation, v. THE CALIFORNIA AUTOMOBILE ASSIGNED RISK PLAN, a program established under California Insurance Code section 11620 et seq., and DOES 1 through 20, Defendants. 16 / 17 18 THE CALIFORNIA AUTOMOBILE ASSIGNED RISK PLAN, 19 20 21 22 23 Counter-Claimant, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts Corporation, Counter-Defendant / 24 25 Before the Court is plaintiff Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s Motion for Leave to 26 File Amended Complaint, filed July 2, 2012. Defendant California Automobile Assigned 27 Risk Plan (“CAARP”) has filed opposition, to which Liberty Mutual has replied. Having read 28 and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court 1 deems the matter suitable for decision thereon, and VACATES the hearing scheduled for 2 August 10, 2012. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 7, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?