Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan, East Bay/North Bay Roofers Vacation Trust Fund, Bay Area Counties Roofing Industry Promotion et al v. MC Construction Services, Inc.

Filing 51

STIPULATED JUDGMENT re 48. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/18/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2012)

Download PDF
1 4 ERSKINE & TULLEY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MICHAEL J. CARROLL (ST. BAR #50246) 3030 Bridgeway, Suite 231 Sausalito, CA 94965 Telephone: (415)729-9006 Facsimile: (415)729-9023 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE BAY AREA ROOFERS HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, ) PACIFIC COAST ROOFERS PENSION PLAN, ) EAST BAY/ NORTH BAY ROOFERS VACATION ) ) TRUST FUND, BAY AREA COUNTIES ROOFING INDUSTRY PROMOTION FUND, BAY ) ) AREA COUNTIES ROOFING INDUSTRY APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND; DOUG ) ) ZIEGLER, TRUSTEE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) MC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., a ) California corporation, ) ) Defendant. ____________________________________ ) NO. C 11 1423 LB AMENDED JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 21 It appearing that Plaintiffs, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE BAY 22 AREA ROOFERS HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, PACIFIC COAST ROOFERS 23 PENSION PLAN, EAST BAY/ NORTH BAY ROOFERS VACATION TRUST FUND, BAY 24 AREA COUNTIES ROOFING INDUSTRY PROMOTION FUND, BAY AREA COUNTIES 25 ROOFING INDUSTRY APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND; DOUG ZIEGLER, TRUSTEE, 26 through their attorneys, and defendant, MC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, 27 INC., a California corporation, have Stipulated that plaintiffs have 28 and recover judgment JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION from Defendant 1 and it appearing that the 1 Stipulation is in all respects proper and that the Stipulation 2 provides for judgment against defendant in the amount of $132,936.58, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiffs have and 4 recover judgment from defendant in the amount of $132,936.58, which 5 is composed of the following: 6 7 a. for January 2012 through October 2012 in the amount of $95,402.49; 8 9 10 Contributions due and unpaid to Plaintiff Trust Funds b. Liquidated damages due and unpaid to the Plaintiff Trust Funds for November 2010 through October 2012 in the amount of $34,802.26; 11 c. Interest due pursuant to contract in the amount of 12 $2,381.83 plus such amount as may be computed at the end of the 13 payment plan set forth below; and 14 15 d. Costs of suit incurred in this action in the amount of $350.00. 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that execution will not 17 issue on the judgment so long as defendant fully complies with the 18 following conditions: 19 1. Defendant shall make payments of all ongoing amounts 20 to become due to the ROOFERS LOCAL UNION NO. 81 AREA TRUST FUNDS 21 pursuant to contract between defendant and Roofers Local Union 81 for 22 hours worked by defendant's employees, commencing with payment for 23 November 2012, hours due on or before December 30, 2012 and continuing 24 until the full amount of this judgment is paid. Each of said payments 25 will be made by check payable to ROOFERS LOCAL UNION NO. 81 AREA TRUST 26 FUND and sent to the post office box on the report form. 27 28 2. Defendant shall pay the amount of the contributions under paragraph (a) in the amount of $95,402.49 in monthly installment JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 2 1 payments as follows: For 4 months the sum of $1,000 each; for the next 2 4 months $2,000 each; thereafter the sum of $4,250.00 until the entire 3 contribution sum has been paid. The first installment is due December 4 30, 2012 and each subsequent installment shall be paid on the 30th of 5 each month thereafter until the entire contribution amount has been 6 paid. 7 ROOFERS LOCAL UNION NO. 81 AREA TRUST FUNDS and sent to the collection 8 attorney, ERSKINE & TULLEY, 3030 Bridgeway, Suite 231, Sausalito, CA 9 94965, Attention: Michael Carroll. Said installment payments will be made by check payable to the 10 3. If the above amount of $95,402.49 plus interest is paid 11 in full, the Delinquency Committee for Plaintiff Trust Funds shall 12 automatically waive recovery of the liquidated damages. 13 is not eligible for a complete waiver of the amounts due under 14 paragraphs (b), defendant shall make payment on the remaining balance 15 of 16 installments of $4,250.00 as may be required to pay the full amount 17 of the judgment, or such lesser sum agreed to by Plaintiff Trust 18 Funds. The first payment would be due after notification of the Trust 19 Funds’ decision, with payments continuing each month thereafter. $37,534.09, 20 4. plus interest in as many If defendant additional monthly Plaintiffs and Defendant each understand and agree that 21 any modification of payments must be made in writing and agreed to by 22 both the Plaintiffs and the Defendant. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that upon failure of the 24 Defendant to make any of their monthly contribution payments pursuant 25 to the collective bargaining agreement as set forth in paragraph 1 26 above, and the monthly installment payments in a timely manner as 27 required 28 stipulation, execution on the entire judgment in the amount of pursuant to JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION the terms of 3 paragraphs 2 and 3 of the 1 $132,936.58 reduced by any offsets for payments made, shall issue only 2 after ten (10) days written notice to the Defendant and Defendant’s 3 counsel that Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs’ attorney declares a default and 4 intends to file a Declaration stating that a default has occurred on 5 the part of the defendant. 6 held by the court upon the earlier execution of this judgment or 7 Plaintiffs’ declaration. December 18, 2012 Dated: ____________________ 8 Defendant waives notice of any hearing 9 10 _____________________________________ Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?