Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan, East Bay/North Bay Roofers Vacation Trust Fund, Bay Area Counties Roofing Industry Promotion et al v. MC Construction Services, Inc.
Filing
51
STIPULATED JUDGMENT re 48. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/18/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2012)
1
4
ERSKINE & TULLEY
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
MICHAEL J. CARROLL (ST. BAR #50246)
3030 Bridgeway, Suite 231
Sausalito, CA 94965
Telephone: (415)729-9006
Facsimile: (415)729-9023
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
2
3
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE BAY AREA
ROOFERS HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, )
PACIFIC COAST ROOFERS PENSION PLAN, )
EAST BAY/ NORTH BAY ROOFERS VACATION )
)
TRUST FUND, BAY AREA COUNTIES
ROOFING INDUSTRY PROMOTION FUND, BAY )
)
AREA COUNTIES ROOFING INDUSTRY
APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND; DOUG )
)
ZIEGLER, TRUSTEE,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., a
)
California corporation,
)
)
Defendant.
____________________________________ )
NO. C 11 1423 LB
AMENDED
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
STIPULATION
21
It appearing that Plaintiffs, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE BAY
22
AREA ROOFERS HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, PACIFIC COAST ROOFERS
23
PENSION PLAN, EAST BAY/ NORTH BAY ROOFERS VACATION TRUST FUND, BAY
24
AREA COUNTIES ROOFING INDUSTRY PROMOTION FUND, BAY AREA COUNTIES
25
ROOFING INDUSTRY APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND; DOUG ZIEGLER, TRUSTEE,
26
through their attorneys, and defendant, MC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,
27
INC., a California corporation, have Stipulated that plaintiffs have
28
and
recover
judgment
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
from
Defendant
1
and
it
appearing
that
the
1
Stipulation is in all respects proper and that the Stipulation
2
provides for judgment against defendant in the amount of $132,936.58,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiffs have and
4
recover judgment from defendant in the amount of $132,936.58, which
5
is composed of the following:
6
7
a.
for January 2012 through October 2012 in the amount of $95,402.49;
8
9
10
Contributions due and unpaid to Plaintiff Trust Funds
b.
Liquidated damages due and unpaid to the Plaintiff
Trust Funds for November 2010 through October 2012 in the amount of
$34,802.26;
11
c.
Interest due pursuant to contract in the amount of
12
$2,381.83 plus such amount as may be computed at the end of the
13
payment plan set forth below; and
14
15
d.
Costs of suit incurred in this action in the amount of
$350.00.
16
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that execution will not
17
issue on the judgment so long as defendant fully complies with the
18
following conditions:
19
1.
Defendant shall make payments of all ongoing amounts
20
to become due to the ROOFERS LOCAL UNION NO. 81 AREA TRUST FUNDS
21
pursuant to contract between defendant and Roofers Local Union 81 for
22
hours worked by defendant's employees, commencing with payment for
23
November 2012, hours due on or before December 30, 2012 and continuing
24
until the full amount of this judgment is paid. Each of said payments
25
will be made by check payable to ROOFERS LOCAL UNION NO. 81 AREA TRUST
26
FUND and sent to the post office box on the report form.
27
28
2.
Defendant shall pay the amount of the contributions
under paragraph (a) in the amount of $95,402.49 in monthly installment
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
2
1
payments as follows: For 4 months the sum of $1,000 each; for the next
2
4 months $2,000 each; thereafter the sum of $4,250.00 until the entire
3
contribution sum has been paid. The first installment is due December
4
30, 2012 and each subsequent installment shall be paid on the 30th of
5
each month thereafter until the entire contribution amount has been
6
paid.
7
ROOFERS LOCAL UNION NO. 81 AREA TRUST FUNDS and sent to the collection
8
attorney, ERSKINE & TULLEY, 3030 Bridgeway, Suite 231, Sausalito, CA
9
94965, Attention: Michael Carroll.
Said installment payments will be made by check payable to the
10
3.
If the above amount of $95,402.49 plus interest is paid
11
in full, the Delinquency Committee for Plaintiff Trust Funds shall
12
automatically waive recovery of the liquidated damages.
13
is not eligible for a complete waiver of the amounts due under
14
paragraphs (b), defendant shall make payment on the remaining balance
15
of
16
installments of $4,250.00 as may be required to pay the full amount
17
of the judgment, or such lesser sum agreed to by Plaintiff Trust
18
Funds. The first payment would be due after notification of the Trust
19
Funds’ decision, with payments continuing each month thereafter.
$37,534.09,
20
4.
plus
interest
in
as
many
If defendant
additional
monthly
Plaintiffs and Defendant each understand and agree that
21
any modification of payments must be made in writing and agreed to by
22
both the Plaintiffs and the Defendant.
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that upon failure of the
24
Defendant to make any of their monthly contribution payments pursuant
25
to the collective bargaining agreement as set forth in paragraph 1
26
above, and the monthly installment payments in a timely manner as
27
required
28
stipulation, execution on the entire judgment in the amount of
pursuant
to
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
the
terms
of
3
paragraphs
2
and
3
of
the
1
$132,936.58 reduced by any offsets for payments made, shall issue only
2
after ten (10) days written notice to the Defendant and Defendant’s
3
counsel that Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs’ attorney declares a default and
4
intends to file a Declaration stating that a default has occurred on
5
the part of the defendant.
6
held by the court upon the earlier execution of this judgment or
7
Plaintiffs’ declaration.
December 18, 2012
Dated: ____________________
8
Defendant waives notice of any hearing
9
10
_____________________________________
Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?