City of Oakland v. SSA Terminals, LLC et al
Filing
54
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Discovery purposes. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/15/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection set for 1/14/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Jury Trial set for 1/14/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference set for 1/3/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/2/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)
*E-Filed 12/2/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
8
12
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.
13
14
Plaintiffs,
v.
No. C 11-01446 RS
CASE MANAGEMENT
SCHEDULING ORDER
15 SSA TERMINALS, LLC, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17 ____________________________________/
18
Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case
19
Management Conference on December 1, 2011. After considering the Joint Case Management
20
Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and
21
good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
22
1.
DISCOVERY.
23
The matter shall be referred to a magistrate judge for any future discovery disputes. On or
24
before August 15, 2012, all non-expert discovery shall be completed. The parties agreed to stipulate
25
to discovery limits.
26
2.
EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions
27
shall proceed as follows:
28
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
A. On or before June 29, 2012, plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony and reports in
accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
B. On or before July 20, 2012, defendant shall disclose expert testimony and reports in
accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
C. On or before August 10, 2012, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed.
3.
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. A Further Case Management
8
Conference shall be held on March 15, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United
9
States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties shall file a
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the Conference.
4.
PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to
Civil Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than November 15, 2012.
5.
PRETRIAL STATEMENTS. At a time convenient to both, counsel shall meet and
14
confer to discuss preparation of a joint pretrial statement, and on or before December 20, 2012,
15
counsel shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement.
16
6.
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The final pretrial conference will be held on January
17
3, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate
18
Avenue, San Francisco, California. Each party or lead counsel who will try the case shall attend
19
personally.
20
7.
TRIAL DATE. Trial shall commence on January 14, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., in
21
Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,
22
California.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
28
2
1
DATED: 12/2/11
_______________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?