City of Oakland v. SSA Terminals, LLC et al

Filing 54

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Discovery purposes. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/15/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection set for 1/14/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Jury Trial set for 1/14/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference set for 1/3/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/2/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 12/2/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 8 12 CITY OF OAKLAND, et al. 13 14 Plaintiffs, v. No. C 11-01446 RS CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 15 SSA TERMINALS, LLC, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 ____________________________________/ 18 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case 19 Management Conference on December 1, 2011. After considering the Joint Case Management 20 Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and 21 good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 22 1. DISCOVERY. 23 The matter shall be referred to a magistrate judge for any future discovery disputes. On or 24 before August 15, 2012, all non-expert discovery shall be completed. The parties agreed to stipulate 25 to discovery limits. 26 2. EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions 27 shall proceed as follows: 28 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A. On or before June 29, 2012, plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). B. On or before July 20, 2012, defendant shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). C. On or before August 10, 2012, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed. 3. FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. A Further Case Management 8 Conference shall be held on March 15, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United 9 States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties shall file a 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the Conference. 4. PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than November 15, 2012. 5. PRETRIAL STATEMENTS. At a time convenient to both, counsel shall meet and 14 confer to discuss preparation of a joint pretrial statement, and on or before December 20, 2012, 15 counsel shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement. 16 6. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The final pretrial conference will be held on January 17 3, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate 18 Avenue, San Francisco, California. Each party or lead counsel who will try the case shall attend 19 personally. 20 7. TRIAL DATE. Trial shall commence on January 14, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., in 21 Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 22 California. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 28 2 1 DATED: 12/2/11 _______________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?