Sylvester v. County of Del Norte et al

Filing 34

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF COUNSEL TO INITIATE CONFERENCE CALL ON 12/16/11 AT 11:15 A.M. re 30 Notice (Other) filed by Taser International, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/5/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Mildred K. O’Linn, Esq. (State Bar No. 159055) MANNING &KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ , TRESTER LLP 15th Floor at 801 Tower 801 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 624-6900 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 mko@manningllp.com Attorneys for Defendant, TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 18 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) COUNTY OF DEL NORTE, TASER ) INTERNATIONAL, INC., and DOES 1 ) through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ____________________________________ ) 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 20 JUNE ELAINE SYLVESTER, 1. Case No.: CV11-1459 EMC [Hon. Judge Edward M. Chen] [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE Hearing Date: 12/16/11 Time: 10:30 a.m. Complaint filed: 03/25/11 Trial Date:04/22/13 Mildred K. O’Linn counsel for defendant TASER International, Inc. is 21 hereby permitted and authorized to appear telephonically at the Status Conference on 22 December 16, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. 12/5/11 Dated: ____________ R NIA 28 ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO hen NO rd M. C G:\docsdata\MKO\Sylvester\Pleadings\Request for Telephonic Appearance Proposed Order.001.wpd RT dwa Judge E H ER FO 27 UNIT ED 26 ________________________________ S DISTRICT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE TE C TA RT U O S 25 LI 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. A 23 Plaintiff counsel Dale Galipo is directed to initiate the conference call to Ms. O'Linn for Def. Taser and William Mitchell for Def. County of Del Norte and call the court last at 11:15 a.m. on December 16, 2011 at (415) 522-2117. C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?