Delson v. Thai Delight Cuisine Company, Ltd. et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, filed by Walter Delson. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 6/19/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PAUL L. REIN, State Bar No. 43053 CELIA MCGUINNESS, State Bar No. 159420 CATHERINE M. CABALO, State Bar No. 248198 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN 200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 832-5001 Facsimile: (510) 832-4787 reinlawoffice@aol.com Attorneys for Plaintiff WALTER DELSON * Defendants’ counsel listed after the caption 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 WALTER DELSON, v. Plaintiff, Civil Rights 14 THAI DELIGHT CUISINE COMPANY, LTD.; MICHELLE J. SCHWARTZ; and DOES 1-10, 16 Inclusive, 15 17 Case No. C11-1464 EDL Defendants. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 18 JEFFREY P. WOO, ESQ. 19 HARRISON T. NAM, ESQ. COOPER, WHITE & COOPER LLP th 20 201 California Street, 17 Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 21 Telephone: 415/433-1900 Facsimile: 415/433-5530 22 Attorneys for Defendant 23 THAI DELIGHT CUISINE COMPANY, LTD. 24 STEPHEN G. PREONAS, ESQ. 25 KATZOFF & RIGGS 1500 Park Avenue, Suite 300 26 Emeryville, CA 94608 Telephone: 510/597-1990 27 Facsimile: 510/597-0295 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. C11-1464 EDL S:\CASES\T\THAI DELIGHT\PLEADINGS\2012 06 14 Stip re Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC 1 2 Attorneys for Defendant MICHELLE J. SCHWARTZ 3 4 TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT AND TO ALL 5 PARTIES AND TO THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 6 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), plaintiff Walter Delson 7 (“Plaintiff”) and defendants Thai Delight Cuisine Company, Ltd. and Michelle J. 8 Schwartz (“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record, 9 hereby STIPULATE that Plaintiff’s action against Defendants be dismissed with 10 prejudice. This Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice is made pursuant to the 11 terms and conditions of a Consent Decree and Order, which resolves Plaintiff’s 12 claims for injunctive relief [see Docket No. 26] and provides for this Court’s 13 continued jurisdiction for enforcement purposes. 14 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 17 18 DATED: June 14, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN 19 /s/ Catherine M. Cabalo Catherine M. Cabalo Attorneys for Plaintiff WALTER DELSON By: 20 21 22 23 24 DATED: June 12, 2012 25 /s/ Harrison T. Nam Harrison T. Nam Attorneys for Defendant THAI DELIGHT CUISINE COMPANY, LTD. By: 26 27 28 COOPER, WHITE & COOPER LLP -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. C11-1464 EDL S:\CASES\T\THAI DELIGHT\PLEADINGS\2012 06 14 Stip re Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC 1 2 DATED: June 12, 2012 KATZOFF & RIGGS 3 4 /s/ Stephen G. Preonas Stephen G. Preonas Attorneys for Defendant MICHELLE J. SCHWARTZ By: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. C11-1464 EDL S:\CASES\T\THAI DELIGHT\PLEADINGS\2012 06 14 Stip re Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC 1 ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 June 19 Dated: __________, 2012 5 __________________________________ Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. C11-1464 EDL S:\CASES\T\THAI DELIGHT\PLEADINGS\2012 06 14 Stip re Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC FILER’S ATTESTATION 1 2 Pursuant to General Order 45, section X(B), I hereby attest that on June 12, 3 2012, I, Catherine Cabalo, received the concurrence of Harrison Nam and Stephen 4 Preonas in the filing of this document. 5 /s/ Catherine Cabalo 6 Catherine Cabalo 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. C11-1464 EDL S:\CASES\T\THAI DELIGHT\PLEADINGS\2012 06 14 Stip re Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?