Wright v. National Credit Union Administration Board et al

Filing 32

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY PLAN. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on September 8, 2011. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

LARRY DEAN WRIGHT,
Plaintiff,

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C-11-01484 EDL
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY
PLAN

v.
OAKLAND MUNICIPAL CREDIT UNION,
Defendant.

/

13
14

At the August 23, 2011 case management conference, the Court ordered the parties to meet

15

and confer regarding a discovery plan in light of the parties’ request to phase discovery. On

16

September 1, 2011, the parties filed a letter regarding their meet and confer efforts, stating that there

17

existed significant areas of disagreement and attaching all of their correspondence regarding the

18

discovery plan. The Court has reviewed the September 1, 2011 filing, but it is unable to readily

19

understand the positions of the parties regarding a discovery plan and therefore cannot provide

20

useful guidance or rule on any outstanding issues. Accordingly, if the parties have not yet resolved

21

their disputes regarding the discovery plan and still seek the Court’s guidance or a ruling, they shall

22

file a joint letter that separately sets forth for each section of the discovery plan: (1) one party’s

23

proposed language for a section of the plan immediately followed by; (2) the other party’s proposed

24

language for the same section of the plan immediately followed by; (3) a brief explanation to support

25

each party’s position on the same section. The joint letter shall also set forth any agreements

26

regarding the plan.

27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 8, 2011

28

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge