Valle et al v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.

Filing 51

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 07/29/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2013)

1
2
3
4

BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK
Norman B. Blumenthal (State Bar No. 068687)
Kyle R. Nordrehaug (State Bar No. 205975)
Aparajit Bhomik (State Bar No. 248066)
Piya Mukherjee (State Bar No. 274217)
225 Calle Clara
La Jolla, CA 92037

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16

CATHERINE VALLE and DON
PEROLINO CRISTOBAL, individuals, on
behalf of themselves and all persons
similarly situated,

19

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs,

17
18

Case No. CV 11-1489 SC

v.
LOWE’S HIW, INC.;
Defendant.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their
designated counsel as follows:
1.

The Parties agree that the action should be reopened so it can be formally

dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(A)(ii) as follows:
a.

All individual claims brought herein by plaintiffs CATHERINE

27
p-stip-dismissFINAL

VALLE AND DON PEROLINO CRISTOBAL (“Plaintiffs”) on their own respective

28

behalves against Defendant LOWE’S HIW, INC. (“Defendant”) are dismissed with
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Case No. 11-1489

1
2

prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
b.

All claims brought herein on behalf of others besides Plaintiffs,

3

including the claims brought on behalf of the putative class and the claims of the State

4

of California, Labor Workforce Development Agency against Defendant are dismissed

5

without prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

6
7

DATED: July 26, 2013

BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG &
BHOWMIK

8
9
10

By: /s/ Aparajit Bhowmik _________________
Aparajit Bhowmik
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

11
12
13

DATED: July 26, 2013

HUNTON & WILLIAMS

14
15

By: /s/ Jason Kim _______________________
Jason Kim
Attorneys for Defendant

16
17

S
UNIT
ED

07/29/2013
DATED: ______________________

21

el Conti

NO

amu
Judge S

23
24

A

H

ER

LI

RT

22

R NIA

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20

FO

19

IT IS SO ORDERED

RT
U
O

18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

25
26
27
p-stip-dismissFINAL

28
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Case No. 11-1489