Banga v. Chevron USA et al
Filing
107
ORDER GRANTING re 102 Letter filed by Capital One for Amy Borlund to appear by phone on 8/3/12 at 9:30 AM for the hearing on the Motion for Protective Order. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/30/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2012)
do II
amr r
el e y
July 26, 2012
VIACM/ECF
Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero
United States District Court
Northern District of California
San Francisco Courthouse
Courtroom G- 15th Floor
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Re:
Kamlesh Banga vs. Chevron USA, et al.
Case No.: CV 11-1498 JCS
Your Honor:
This office represents Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. ("Capital
One") in the case captioned above. Capital One hereby requests to appear
telephonically at the hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order scheduled
before this Court on August 3, 2012 at 9:30a.m., on the following grounds:
1. Capital One's counsel's office is located in Los Angeles, California;
2. Capital One's counsel will be fully prepared to address the issues on
Plaintiffs motion via telephonic participation; and
3. Telephonic appearance by counsel will not prejudice any party or
interfere with the proceedings.
The Court may reach Capital One's counsel at (310) 557-9126 on the day
of the hearing. Capital One respectfully requests that its request be granted and its
counsel participate in the August 3, 2012 hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for
Protective Order by telephone.
C
AmyBorlund
NO
seph C.
Judge Jo
Spero
R NIA
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
DIFIE
AS MO
FO
UNIT
ED
Dated: 7/30/12
T
TA
RT
U
O
S
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
Sincerely,
Ms. Borlund shall be on phone
standby beginning at 9:30 AM and
await the Court's call.
ISTRIC
ES D
T
LI
RT
Doll Armr & Eley LLP 1888 Century Park East. Suite 1850, Los Angeles, CA 90067
A
H
Phone 310.557.9100 Facsimile 310.557.9101 www.dollamir.com
ER
C
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?