Banga v. Chevron USA et al

Filing 107

ORDER GRANTING re 102 Letter filed by Capital One for Amy Borlund to appear by phone on 8/3/12 at 9:30 AM for the hearing on the Motion for Protective Order. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/30/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2012)

Download PDF
do II amr r el e y July 26, 2012 VIACM/ECF Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero United States District Court Northern District of California San Francisco Courthouse Courtroom G- 15th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Kamlesh Banga vs. Chevron USA, et al. Case No.: CV 11-1498 JCS Your Honor: This office represents Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. ("Capital One") in the case captioned above. Capital One hereby requests to appear telephonically at the hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order scheduled before this Court on August 3, 2012 at 9:30a.m., on the following grounds: 1. Capital One's counsel's office is located in Los Angeles, California; 2. Capital One's counsel will be fully prepared to address the issues on Plaintiffs motion via telephonic participation; and 3. Telephonic appearance by counsel will not prejudice any party or interfere with the proceedings. The Court may reach Capital One's counsel at (310) 557-9126 on the day of the hearing. Capital One respectfully requests that its request be granted and its counsel participate in the August 3, 2012 hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order by telephone. C AmyBorlund NO seph C. Judge Jo Spero R NIA ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO FO UNIT ED Dated: 7/30/12 T TA RT U O S IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Sincerely, Ms. Borlund shall be on phone standby beginning at 9:30 AM and await the Court's call. ISTRIC ES D T LI RT Doll Armr & Eley LLP 1888 Century Park East. Suite 1850, Los Angeles, CA 90067 A H Phone 310.557.9100 Facsimile 310.557.9101 www.dollamir.com ER C N F D IS T IC T O R

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?