Banga v. Chevron USA et al
Filing
198
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE A SUR-REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; STRIKING ALL REFERENCE TO THE MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on December 17, 2012. (jcslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2012)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
KAMLESH BANGA,
Plaintiff,
9
10
v.
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., et al.,
Case No.: C-12-01498 JCS
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO FILE A SUR-REPLY IN
FURTHER SUPPORT OF HER
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT
CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
STRIKING ALL REFERENCE TO
THE MEDIATION
Defendants.
The Court grants Plaintiff Kamlesh Banga‟s Motion to File a Sur-reply in Further Support of
15
Plaintiff‟s Opposition to Defendant Chevron U.S.A., Inc.‟s Motion for Summary Judgment. All
16
references to the Chevron‟s mediation brief shall be stricken in accordance with ADR Local Rule 6-
17
7(b), which provides that “[written Mediation Statements] constitute confidential information as
18
defined in ADR L.R. 6-12, must not be filed and the assigned Judge shall not have access to them.”
19
Plaintiff‟s references to correspondence between the parties, and with the mediator, in connection
20
with the mediation, shall be stricken in accordance with ADR Local Rule 6-12. ADR Local Rule 6-12
21
states in relevant part:
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(a) Confidential Treatment. Except as provided in subdivision (b) of this local rule, … all
counsel and parties … shall treat as „confidential information‟ the contents of the written
Mediation Statements, anything that happened or was said, any position taken, and any view
of the merits of the case expressed by any participant in connection with any mediation.
„Confidential information shall not be:
(1)
(2)
(3)
Disclosed to anyone not involved in the litigation;
Disclosed to the assigned judge; or
Used for any purpose, including impeachment, in any pending or future
proceeding in this court.
1
2
3
(b)
Limited Exceptions to Confidentiality. This rule does not prohibit:
4
(1)
(2)
5
(3)
6
(4)
7
(5)
8
9
(6)
Disclosures that may be stipulated by all parties and the mediator;
Disclosures as may be stipulated by all parties, without the consent of the
mediator, for use in a subsequent confidential ADR or settlement proceeding;
A report to or an inquiry by the ADR Magistrate Judge pursuant to ADR L.R.
2-4 regarding a possible violation of the ADR Local Rules;
The mediator from discussing the mediation with the court‟s ADR staff, who
shall maintain the confidentiality of the mediation;
Any participant or the mediator from responding to an appropriate request for
information duly made by persons authorized by the court to monitor or
evaluate the court‟s ADR program in accordance with ADR L.R. 2-6; or
Disclosures as are otherwise required by law.
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
ADR L.R. 6-12.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated: December 17, 2012
15
16
17
_________________________________
18
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?