Banga v. Chevron USA et al

Filing 47

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF 10/21/11 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Further Case Management Conference reset for 12/16/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Updated joint cmc statement due 12/9/11. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/13/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DELIA A. ISVORANU, Bar No. 226750 DIsvoranu@browneassa.com TARA K. CLANCY, Bar No. 253321 tclancy@browneassa.com BROWN EASSA & MCLEOD, LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1800 Oakland, California 94612-3520 Telephone: 510.444.3131 Facsimile: 510.839.7940 Attorneys for Defendant CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 KAMLESH BANGA, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. C 11-1498 JCS Plaintiff, v. CHEVRON USA, HOUSEHOLD BANK, CAPITAL ONE, DIRECT LENDING SOURCE, ECHOSTAR, Does 1 through 10 inclusive JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF OCTOBER 21, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Kamlesh Banga (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (“Chevron”) 20 (erroneously sued as “Chevron USA”), HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. (“HSBC”) (erroneously sued 21 as “Household Bank”), and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (“Capital One”) (erroneously sued as 22 “Capital One”) (collectively “Defendants”) hereby request and stipulate that the Court continue 23 the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) scheduled for October 21, 2011, for at least forty- 24 five (45) days. 25 When the Court initially scheduled the further CMC, it was contemplated that the parties 26 would have completed mediation by October 20, 2011. However, just recently, on September 22, 27 2011, the Court appointed counsel to represent Plaintiff for purposes of mediation only. In that 28 regard, the parties have separately agreed and stipulated (Document #42) to continue the -1- 1 9 9 9 H A R R I S O N S TREET , SUITE 1 8 0 0 O AKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 -3 5 2 0 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF OCTOBER 21, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 11-1498 JCS 1 mediation completion deadline by forty-five (45) days in order to allow newly appointed counsel 2 for Plaintiff to familiarize himself with this matter. Thus, the parties are unable to complete 3 mediation before the currently scheduled October 21, 2011 CMC and, for that reason, the parties 4 hereby request and stipulate to a related forty-five (45) day continuance of the CMC to allow the 5 parties time to complete mediation. 6 SO STIPULATED 7 8 Dated: October 11, 2011 BROWN EASSA & MCLEOD, LLP 9 By: 10 11 /s/ DELIA A. ISVORANU Attorneys for Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 12 13 14 Dated: October 11, 2011 KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP 15 By: 16 17 /s/ MATTHEW M. MAHER Attorneys for Defendant HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. 18 19 Dated: October 11, 2011 DOLL AMIR & ELEY LLP 20 21 By: /s/ HEMMY SO Attorneys for Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. 22 23 24 25 Dated: October 11, 2011 /s/ KAMLESH BANGA Plaintiff 26 27 28 1 9 9 9 H A R R I S O N S TREET , SUITE 1 8 0 0 O AKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 -3 5 2 0 /// /// -2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF OCTOBER 21, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 11-1498 JCS 1 ORDER 2 IT IS ORDERED: 3 The Case Management Conference in this matter currently scheduled for October 21, 4 2011, is hereby continued to Dec. 16, 2011 , at 1:30 5 parties shall file updated Case Management Conference statements no later than 12/9 a.m./p.m. in this Department. The 6 S ER H 12 pero FO S seph C. Judge Jo LI RT 11 R NIA HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge NO 10 October 13, 2011 A 9 DATED: UNIT ED 8 RT U O 7 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T N F D IS T IC T O R C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 9 9 9 H A R R I S O N S TREET , SUITE 1 8 0 0 O AKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 -3 5 2 0 -3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF OCTOBER 21, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 11-1498 JCS , 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?