Banga v. Chevron USA et al
Filing
47
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF 10/21/11 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Further Case Management Conference reset for 12/16/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Updated joint cmc statement due 12/9/11. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/13/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DELIA A. ISVORANU, Bar No. 226750
DIsvoranu@browneassa.com
TARA K. CLANCY, Bar No. 253321
tclancy@browneassa.com
BROWN EASSA & MCLEOD, LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1800
Oakland, California 94612-3520
Telephone:
510.444.3131
Facsimile:
510.839.7940
Attorneys for Defendant
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
KAMLESH BANGA,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. C 11-1498 JCS
Plaintiff,
v.
CHEVRON USA, HOUSEHOLD BANK,
CAPITAL ONE, DIRECT LENDING
SOURCE, ECHOSTAR, Does 1 through
10 inclusive
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF
OCTOBER 21, 2011 CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Defendants.
18
19
Plaintiff Kamlesh Banga (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (“Chevron”)
20
(erroneously sued as “Chevron USA”), HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. (“HSBC”) (erroneously sued
21
as “Household Bank”), and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (“Capital One”) (erroneously sued as
22
“Capital One”) (collectively “Defendants”) hereby request and stipulate that the Court continue
23
the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) scheduled for October 21, 2011, for at least forty-
24
five (45) days.
25
When the Court initially scheduled the further CMC, it was contemplated that the parties
26
would have completed mediation by October 20, 2011. However, just recently, on September 22,
27
2011, the Court appointed counsel to represent Plaintiff for purposes of mediation only. In that
28
regard, the parties have separately agreed and stipulated (Document #42) to continue the
-1-
1 9 9 9 H A R R I S O N S TREET ,
SUITE 1 8 0 0
O AKLAND, CALIFORNIA
94612 -3 5 2 0
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF
OCTOBER 21, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. C 11-1498 JCS
1
mediation completion deadline by forty-five (45) days in order to allow newly appointed counsel
2
for Plaintiff to familiarize himself with this matter. Thus, the parties are unable to complete
3
mediation before the currently scheduled October 21, 2011 CMC and, for that reason, the parties
4
hereby request and stipulate to a related forty-five (45) day continuance of the CMC to allow the
5
parties time to complete mediation.
6
SO STIPULATED
7
8
Dated: October 11, 2011
BROWN EASSA & MCLEOD, LLP
9
By:
10
11
/s/
DELIA A. ISVORANU
Attorneys for Defendant
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
12
13
14
Dated: October 11, 2011
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
15
By:
16
17
/s/
MATTHEW M. MAHER
Attorneys for Defendant
HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.
18
19
Dated: October 11, 2011
DOLL AMIR & ELEY LLP
20
21
By:
/s/
HEMMY SO
Attorneys for Defendant
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
22
23
24
25
Dated: October 11, 2011
/s/
KAMLESH BANGA
Plaintiff
26
27
28
1 9 9 9 H A R R I S O N S TREET ,
SUITE 1 8 0 0
O AKLAND, CALIFORNIA
94612 -3 5 2 0
///
///
-2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF
OCTOBER 21, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. C 11-1498 JCS
1
ORDER
2
IT IS ORDERED:
3
The Case Management Conference in this matter currently scheduled for October 21,
4
2011, is hereby continued to Dec. 16, 2011 , at 1:30
5
parties shall file updated Case Management Conference statements no later than 12/9
a.m./p.m. in this Department. The
6
S
ER
H
12
pero
FO
S
seph C.
Judge Jo
LI
RT
11
R NIA
HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
NO
10
October 13, 2011
A
9
DATED:
UNIT
ED
8
RT
U
O
7
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 9 9 9 H A R R I S O N S TREET ,
SUITE 1 8 0 0
O AKLAND, CALIFORNIA
94612 -3 5 2 0
-3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF
OCTOBER 21, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. C 11-1498 JCS
, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?