Larkin v. Yelp! Inc.
Filing
37
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Amending Stipulation Re: Settlement of Class And Collective Actions filed by Yelp! Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Approval and Settlement Hearing)(Heinicke, Malcolm) (Filed on 7/2/2012)
1
2
3
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
MALCOLM A. HEINICKE (SBN 194174)
Malcolm.Heinicke@mto.com
560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2907
Telephone: (415) 512-4000; Facsimile: (415) 512-4077
4
Attorneys for Defendant
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
PETER RUKIN (SBN 178336)
RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL LLP
100 Pine Street, Suite 2150
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 421-1800; Facsimile (415) 421-1700
Email: peterrukin@rhdtlaw.com
Rosa Vigil-Gallenberg (SBN 251872)
GALLENBERG PC
9701 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1000
Beverly Hills, CA 90071
Telephone: (310) 295-1654; Facsimile: (310) 733-5654
Email: rosa@gallenberglaw.com
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
JUSTIN LARKIN, ANTHONY
TIJERINO, and AHMAD DEANES, on
behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
22
STIPULATION AMENDING
STIPULATION RE: SETTLEMENT OF
CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTIONS
Plaintiffs,
20
21
CASE NO. CV 11-1503 EMC
Judge:
Honorable Edward M. Chen
v.
YELP! INC.,
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
17884296.1
STIPULATION TO AMEND SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT; CV11-1503 EMC
1
WHEREAS, the Settling Parties have entered the Stipulation Re: Settlement of
2
Class And Collective Actions (“Stipulation”), and presented this class and collective action
3
settlement to the Court for preliminary approval;
4
5
WHEREAS, Defendant has provided notice of this class and collective action
settlement to pertinent government officials pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005;
6
WHEREAS, following a hearing on June 4, 2012, the Court stated its intention to
7
grant preliminary approval for the proposed settlement, provided the Settling Parties agreed to
8
three changes to the settlement;
9
WHEREAS, Section 2.11.9 of the Stipulation Re: Settlement of Class And
10
Collective Actions allows the Settling Parties to amend that agreement and authorizes Class
11
Counsel to do for the Class Representatives;
WHEREAS, the parties, through their counsel of record agree as follows, IT IS
12
13
HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that:
(1)
14
Paragraph 2.4.11 is added to the Stipulation, and it states: “The California
15
Notice and the National Notice will provide a website address (administered by the Claims
16
Administrator), this website shall remain open until the Notice Response Deadline, and it shall
17
make available to class members the following documents: (a) the operative complaint in the
18
Litigation; (b) the operative answer in the Litigation; (c) the complete settlement agreement; (d)
19
Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval; (e) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of
20
Settlement and Award of Attorneys’ Fees; (f) the order granting preliminary approval and setting
21
the Settlement Hearing; and (g) one generic (non-Class Member specific) copy of both the
22
National Notice and California Notice with associated forms.”
23
(2)
The California Notice and National Notice are amended such that (a) on
24
the first page of the notice, the second initial disclosure includes the language: “IF YOU TAKE
25
NO ACTION, YOU MAY BE SUBJECT TO A RELEASE AND LOSE CLAIMS WITHOUT
26
COMPENSATION”; and (b) the sentence containing the anticipated settlement sum is now
27
printed in bold and underlined text.
28
17884296.1
-2-
STIPULATION TO AMEND SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT; CV11-1503 EMC
1
(3)
Section VIII of the California Notice and National Notice are amended to
2
add the following sentence: “At this website [WEBSITE ADDRESS], you can obtain copies of
3
the following documents: (a) the operative complaint in the Litigation; (b) the operative answer
4
in the litigation; (c) the complete settlement agreement; (d) the motion for preliminary approval;
5
(e) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Settlement and Award of Attorneys’ Fees when it is
6
filed; and (f) the order granting preliminary approval and setting the Settlement Hearing.”
7
(4)
Paragraph 2.5.5 of the Stipulation is amended to read as follows:
8
“California Class Members who have not filed a valid Opt Out and all National Class Members
9
may object to the Stipulation and/or request for award of attorneys’ fees and costs by submitting
10
written objections to Class Counsel (either directly or via the Claims Administrator) no later than
11
the date that is ten days after the Settlement Hearing Motion Date. The California Notice and the
12
National Notice shall advise California Class Members and National Class Members of this
13
option. Class Counsel shall immediately provide any such objections to Yelp and subsequently
14
the Court during the final approval process. The Settling Parties agree to respond to any
15
objections at a hearing before the Court.” This amendment removes the following language:
16
“California Class Members who have not filed a valid Opt Out and all National Class Members
17
may object to Class Counsel’s request for attorneys’ fees within ten (10) days of Class Counsel’s
18
motion for such fees”
19
(5)
The sixth sentence of Paragraph 2.6.2 of the Stipulation is amended to read
20
as follows: “The funds associated with any checks that are not properly or timely negotiated shall
21
revert to Yelp, which shall then, within thirty (30) days, donate such funds to the Volunteer Legal
22
Services Program of the Bar Association of San Francisco, and shall be identified as cy pres
23
proceeds from the settlement of Larkin v. Yelp, Case No. CV 11-01503 EMC.”
24
(6)
The first paragraph of Section V.D. of the California Notice and National
25
Notice is amended to read: “If you do not like any terms of the Settlement or Class Counsel’s
26
request for attorneys’ fees and costs, you can submit a written objection. Your objection must be
27
in writing and include your full name, address, telephone number, signature and a statement that
28
you object to the Settlement in Larkin v. Yelp! Inc., C.A. No. 11-01503 EMC and the reason(s)
17884296.1
-3-
STIPULATION TO AMEND SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT; CV11-1503 EMC
1
for your objection. The objection should be mailed to Peter Rukin at Rukin Hyland Doria &
2
Tindall LLP, 100 Pine Street, Suite 2150, San Francisco, CA 94111, and postmarked no later than
3
[Objection Deadline].” The third paragraph of Section V.D. of the California Notice and National
4
Notice is stricken.
5
(7)
The first sentence of Paragraph 2.4.10 of the Stipulation is amended to
6
read: “To the extent a Class Member has not submitted to the Claims Administrator some form
7
of written response to the Class Notice, i.e., a change of address form, an opt out or a claim form,
8
by the date that is fifteen (15) days before the Notice Response Deadline, the Claims
9
Administrator shall send that Class Member a postcard (a) referencing the name of the Litigation;
10
(b) stating that the Class Member previously received a notice in this action; (c) providing a
11
physical and email address for the Claims Administrator and stating that the Class Member can
12
write the Claims Administrator to receive an additional copy of the notice; and (d) stating that at
13
the following website: [WEBSITE ADDRESS] there are available copies of relevant settlement
14
documents, including the National Notice and California Notice with associated forms.”
With these changes agreed to, the Settling Parties respectfully renew their request
15
16
for preliminary approval of the settlement.
17
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: June 29, 2012
19
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
Malcolm A. Heinicke
By:/s/ Malcolm A. Heinicke
Attorneys for Defendant YELP! INC.
20
21
22
DATED: June 29, 2012
RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL LLP
23
24
By:/s/ Peter Rukin
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
25
26
27
I, Malcolm A. Heinicke, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being
used to file this STIPULATION AMENDING STIPULATION RE: SETTLEMENT OF
CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTIONS . In accordance with General Order 45.X.B., I
hereby attest that Peter Rukin concurred in this filing.
28
17884296.1
-4-
STIPULATION TO AMEND SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT; CV11-1503 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?