Larkin v. Yelp! Inc.

Filing 46

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continue Deadline to File Motion for Final Approval and Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Ahmad Deanes, Justin Larkin, Anthony Tijerino. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Continue Deadline to File Motion for Final Approval and Attorney Fees and Costs)(Rukin, Peter) (Filed on 10/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 6 7 8 9 JUSTIN LARKIN, ANTHONY TIJERINO, and Case No. 3:11-cv-01503-EMC AHMAD DEANES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR Plaintiffs, FINAL APPROVAL AND ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS v. Date: November 30, 2012 Time: 2:30 p.m. Courtroom: 5 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen YELP! INC., Defendant. 10 11 12 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines associated with the filing of counsels’ 13 motions for settlement approval and award of attorneys’ fees, and any objections thereto, are 14 modified as follows: 15 16 (1) settlement, and Class Counsel shall file a motion for an award of attorneys' fees and 17 costs. Both of these motions shall be posted to the class website on the same date. 18 19 (2) Written objections by California Class Members and National Class Members to the proposed settlement or Class Counsel's Request for attorneys' fees will be 20 considered if received by Class Counsel on or before November 5, 2012. Counsel for 21 the parties shall respond to any such objections by November 16, 2012. 22 23 By October 19, 2012, the parties shall file a joint motion for final approval of the (3) A copy of this Order shall be posted on the class website within two days of entry. 24 25 26 DATED:_______________ Hon. Edward M. Chen United States District Judge 27 4 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:11-cv-01503-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?