Johnson v. McHugh

Filing 12

ORDER re: ADA inspection schedule (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)

S
7

Attorneys for Defendant
JOHN A. McHUGH

R NIA
FO

LI

ER

H

6

Judge S

RT

5

ston

usan Ill

NO

4

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

A

3

UNIT
ED

2

DAVID R. BURTT, State Bar No. 201220
[e-mail]
ANDREW J. MAILHOT, State Bar No. 238956
[e-mail]
ONGARO BURTT & LOUDERBACK LLP
595 Market Street, Suite 610
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

C

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID JOHNSON,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. CV-11-1515 SI
PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER RE
ADA ACT

JOHN A. McHUGH,

15

Defendant.

16
17
18

The parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this Proposed Scheduling Order re
ADA Act:

19

1.

20

Pursuant to General Order No. 56, the parties will serve their Initial Disclosures by no

21

Initial Disclosures

later than October 25, 2011.

22

2.

23

Pursuant to General Order No. 56, the parties have scheduled a site inspection to be

Site Inspection

24

conducted on November 1, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., at the Taco Bell restaurant located at 500 Contra

25

Costa Blvd. in Pleasant Hill, California.

26
27
28
PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER RE ADA ACT
Case No. CV-11-1515-SI

1

3.

2

Although no ADR has occurred to date, the parties believe the prospects of settlement are

Settlement and ADR

3

high. If the case does not settle after

proposal for remediation,

4

Plaintiff will file a Notice of Need for Mediation.

5
6

DATED: October 13, 2011

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS N. STEWART, III

7
By: /s/ Thomas N. Stewart, III
Thomas N. Stewart

8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiff
DAVID JOHNSON

10
11
12

DATED: October 13, 2011

ONGARO BURTT & LOUDERBACK LLP

13
14
15
16

By: /s/ David R. Burtt
David R. Burtt
Attorneys for Defendant
JOHN A. McHUGH

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER RE ADA ACT
Case No. CV-11-1515-SI

1
2
3

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, David R. Burtt, attest that concurrence in the filing of this Joint Case Management
Statement has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

4
__/s/ David R. Burtt_______
David R. Burtt

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER RE ADA ACT
Case No. CV-11-1515-SI

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
(FRCP 5)
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California. I am
employed in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of
eighteen years and not a party to the within entitled action. My business address is 595 Market
Street, Suite 610, San Francisco, CA 94105.
I hereby certify that on October 14, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing
PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER RE ADA ACT
with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing
to the following:

11

Thomas N. Stewart, III
Attorney at Law
369 Blue Oak Lane, 2nd Floor
Clayton, CA 94517

12

Attorneys for Plaintiff David Johnson

10

13
14

Executed on October 13, 2011, at San Francisco, California.

15
/s/ Martin Skowron
Martin Skowron

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER RE ADA ACT
Case No. CV-11-1515-SI